Here is RICO, as applied to these cases, from NOLO, and some information about representing yourself in small claims courts ranging from small claims to bigger claims courts. Keep in mind that small claims courts can compel the people that you are suing to produce information of all kinds, and also evidence for larger lawsuits.
I have highlighted the relevant section, but also notice that RICO was used to prosecute well known stalkers from anti-abortion group Operation Rescue. Many/most cases of gang stalking happen in conservative areas of the country, and church members and police are heavily involved.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
Passed in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. Such activity may include illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, money laundering, counterfeiting, embezzlement, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other unsavory business practices.To convict a defendant under RICO, the government must prove that the defendant engaged in two or more instances of racketeering activity and that the defendant directly invested in, maintained an interest in, or participated in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. The law has been used to prosecute members of the mafia, the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, and Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group, among many others.
Blake Smith, Keith Roberts, Union County Sheriff’s Department and Jimmy Edwards
Richard Moore has been stalked and harassed by people who think they are above the law. And as we see in these cases, often they are “the law,” at least in their own minds. But the reality is that they are criminals, doing criminal things, and their is no one to “police” the police.
As we see in nearly every case of gang stalking, these gangs are comprised of nearly 100% current and former police, firefighters, investigators and others who cover over each others stalking and harassment crimes; and none of them believe in the rights enshrined in the US constitution, or the rule of law.
For many decades, an under current of conversations regarding western social structure discussed “police gangs” in somewhat hesitant manner for the obvious reason that critics of law enforcement become targets themselves. This threat FROM law enforcement is very real, and claims actual victims, including homicides.
Here below is one example of how actual police actually threatened people, after an actual gang of now-indicted police “gang members” murdered two people in cold blood after lying on a no-knock warrant, and planting evidence-an unimaginably anti-democratic practice:
“We are sick and tired ofhaving targets on our back,” Gamaldi said. “We are sick and tired of having dirtbags trying to take our lives when all we’re trying to do is protect this community and protect our families.”
Gamaldi said while we live in the greatest city in the world, there are some who are fostering resentment against police in Houston.
“Enough is enough. If you’re the ones out there spreading the rhetoric that police officers are the enemy, well just know we’ve all got your number now,” Gamaldi said. “We’re going to be keeping track on all of y’all, and we’re going to make sure to hold you accountable every time you stir the pot on our police officers.”
Police as targets? Since when? Since never. And as we see in the case above, Gamaldi was not just protecting “the narrative” by threatening anyone who looked deeper into it, but also, protecting an actual gang of actual criminals whose charges include two murders, lying to the authorities with malice, theft, drug possession, clock milking, and other typical criminal behaviors.
Keep in mind that this was an actual threat, and it was indeed directed at me, and others who write about these issues. My old blog was hacked and de-platformed shortly after I named these people online. And I even traced the hack to Texas. So what we have is a bunch of actual indicted criminals covered for by other criminals who issue threats, no different than any other organized mafia. How did we get here?
It started with scapegoats, and the ever present threat narrative promulgated by these exact same people, as we see in the example above. It’s unthinkable that police should be threatening people, but threaten they do. So the threat is very real.
But since the egregious abuses of the War on Drugs brought us scapegoats, and then, the War on Terror brought actual CIA designed and funded programs into our every day lives, laundered through many various state and federal agencies, these conversations have become louder, angrier, and more informed.
None of it is within the scope of democratic practices, and all of it is completely in line with totalitarianism as discussed in our most basic school textbooks. Indeed, America and the west in general have become the exact bogeyman they feared from Russia, or China, or any banana republic ever.
Richard Moore is a so-called sex offender, and last time I checked, he is on the sex offender registry. Indeed he himself has written about it quite openly. His case is one of those deals where a guy gets caught up in one of the many entrapment schemes run by police.
These schemes are disguised under “investigation privileged” tactics and methods, and include all kinds of illegal activity BY the police and investigative agencies that it shocks the conscience of ordinary people once exposed. This includes what are colloquially called “frame jobs” and unethical practices that range from undocumented wiretaps of peoples homes and computers, to . Here below are just a few:
-Muslims are targeted with pop-up advertisements cajoling them to join jihadist movements. I myself have observed these in the presence of Muslim friends and allies.
-suspected “white supremacists” are targeted with “speech baiting”by the Anti Defamation League and other race-based groups who monitor social media and the internet
-sex offenders are targeted in so many types of bizarrely crafted schemes as to defy the imagination. Here’s more about that from the Florida Action Committee
-people who seek to buy marijuana pipes or seeds online are targeted with enticements to buy heroin, cocaine, and other drugs
Beyond the insanity of these registries, which is well documented, we find that they perpetuate the most hypocritical and worst examples of Jewish0christian culture, specifically the practice of “scapegoating,” which you can read about here
I encountered Mr. Moore’s case in this article from the Fort Worth Weekly, where a journalist explored “gangs” of “stalkers” and nearly 100% of those stalkers were and are current and former police, investigators, county coroners, and others associated with the massive US policing and privatized prison industries. Indeed, if you dig deep enough, you will find real cases of gang stalking.
But perhaps most strikingly is that the author, Teri Webster, who also writes for the Dallas Morning News, had asked to interview a notorious (and well funded) group called “Targeted Justice” who claim to “help” actual targeted individuals, but who are in fact, actual stalkers. They refused to be interviewed, but then, showed up in the article claiming otherwise. This is fairly typical for these groups, because in media terminology, they are called a “misinformation” and “disinfrmation” operation–a cover for this illegal police activity.
The leader of the group in that area is one Richard Lighthouse, and these people are well known frauds, all of them with one form or another of military and spy agency credentials.The entire operation is designed to discredit targets, and spread bad information, such as “electronic brain zappers! !mind reading locusts!! and aliens!! and GHOSTS!!! and talking to the dead!!!,” etc.
But its not as often that either of the following things happen:
-an actual main stream media outlet discusses gang stalking, and
-an actual psychobabbling moron appears in the comments section rambling about debunked pseudo science from the 1980’s era CIA “Satanic Panic” catalogue
I advise any journalist, researcher, or psychologist to read that story, to better understand gang stalking, and especially to note how disinformation is spread. In this case, we see one “Tifffany Fontenot” actually attempting to discredit Mr. Moore, and in doing so, clearly attempts what is colloquially called “mind control,” by inserting psychobabble straight out of the CIA. Note in the following exchange that she has reversed the idea that victims are in fact perpetrators–a staple ploy in their dialectic bag of tricks:
Here is her attempt:
There is a particular man in your article who literally appears to be a perp. Moore is a registered sex offender complete with tattooed tear drop coming out of his eye. How did you find that guy? He ran a smear campaign on a leading member in the TI community using very common perping tactics such as name calling (one thing he called her was a whore among many others) and claiming others were doing to him what he, himself was actually perpetrating, and yet that same guy showed up in your article? Interesting coincidence isn’t it? There are many people claiming to be TI’s who actually are not in order to attempt to keep this global torture and trafficking network from being discovered by the public. They attack TI’s and try to make TI’s look delusional in order to keep the torture/trafficking network going.
Teri, Did you get benefit for writing this article in any way from the defense or law enforcement, or medical industry, or through anyone at FWW in ANY way via an EMF targeting business making money off of people you are doing a hit piece on? I’m just wondering because these smear pieces are a regular occurrence against TI’s being used as medical guinea pigs in the Global Ai Arms Race to weaponize the brain nonconsensually and being slowly slaughtered unto their deaths.
In this example, we see many things at play that to an ordinary observer just looks like another rabbit hole full of strangely shaped bunnies, but to the keen observer we see that Ms. Fontenot’s entire dialectic is hard right, religion based, full of actual and provable lies, and more, including that she has indeed targeted someone online, and likely offline too. She is a proponent of “reverse speech analysis,” which was concieved as a way for hard-right religious nuts to analyze rock and roll music to find hidden messages, a sort of offshoot of other junk science that seeks to find “the devil” or the Virgin Mary in slices of toast, and tree bark. Here’s more about that total time waster, from her (time wasting) website.
These groups are massive, well funded, and dangerous, with actual homicides to their credit. Its is time we do indeed “target targeted individuals,” but this time by first identifying their actual victims, and then, suing those responsible, because the threat they pose is very real.
The far right, neocon religious types get off on “snuff” and ” torture” pornography. The War on Terror gave them lots of access to create that.Like Hitler, this group of neocons provided exactly what the 1% desire.
The terrorist has been captured, and the clock is ticking. FBI agents know they need to use humane interrogation methods to get the information that could stop a deadly attack. But clueless politicians in Washington want to use torture, wasting precious minutes and putting the mission at risk.
It sounds like a parody of a post-9/11 spy thriller. But it’s a scenario that keeps recurring in Ali Soufan’s autobiography, The Black Banners (Declassified). Soufan, a retired FBI agent who was pursuing Al Qaeda long before it was a household name, argues that secrecy and the thirst for torture made it harder to protect Americans. We would have been better served, he shows, if Washington had treated terrorism as a law enforcement problem, not an exception to the law.
Much of Soufan’s story has already been told, both in the heavily censored 2011 edition of his book and in the official 9/11 Commission Report. In the months before September 11, 2001, the CIA failed to give the FBI crucial information that could have stopped the attackers and saved thousands of American lives. In the years that followed, the FBI-CIA rivalry continued to hinder counterterrorism efforts.
The new edition of The Black Banners—finally fully declassified after a lengthy legal battle—paints an even more disturbing picture. FBI agents had been waging an effective fight against Al Qaeda using ordinary interrogation tactics. But after 9/11, the Bush administration unleashed torture methods that were self-sabotaging as well as immoral.
News articles about organized gang stalking, lawsuits and “targeted individual programs” are gaining steam in the mainstream press, four years after I waged a one person public relations blitz against this form of “intelligence led predictive policing” which is really just junk science, and orthodox biased reporting combined with equally biased data.
Unlike the stories you will find using ROGS Analysis, main stream media is partisan, and biased, and always defaults to “official sources” in the narrative. Yet recently, even the USA Today covered “targeted individual programs,” and called them by their proper name, and even cited the movie “The Minority Report,” as many gang stalking targets have discussed online too. .
Unfortunately, the “official sources” in the gang stalking discourse are all police, forensic investigators, and pro-police psychologists who encouraged the racial profiling and rampant surveillance abuses of the last two decades. You can view these scurrilous persons here, most notoriously the internet famous “anonymous poll” created by Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, whose negligent commentary on that issue has unarguably led to homicides and suicides of targeted individuals.
The Pasco sheriff’s office, in its lengthier statement, said the program is modeled after one adopted in the United Kingdom in the 1990s and that the idea is not to target anyone for harassment.
“It is the goal of the Pasco Sheriff’s Office to have a positive impact on these individuals and our community,” the statement says.
The sheriff’s statement specifically mentions the 2002 film “Minority Report,” which starred Tom Cruise as chief of a “precrime” police bureau that arrests people before any crime is committed based on information provided by psychics.
The program, the sheriff’s office says in part, is not “in any way, shape or form the ideals or implementations projected in the film ‘Minority Report.'”
A central piece of that movie is the idea that some of the psychics disagree with the majority on whether a specific person will become a criminal.
Other jurisdictions have tackled similar issues. The Los Angeles Police Department, for example, last year scrapped for financial reasons a controversial program called “Pred-Pol” that sought to predict where property crimes would occur. Critics said it focused disproportionately on Black and Hispanic communities.
The Florida lawsuit contends the Pasco program violates constitutional amendments that protect rights of association and due process, and against unreasonable searches and seizures
So, when even the most pasty white piece of pabulum journalism on the planet earth–the USA Today— calls a targeted individual program a “targeted individual program,” you can bet that more is to come. Stay tuned.
Modern terror cells masquerade as “see something say something” types, both online and off. The reality however is much darker than mere charades and cloaked purpose, as we see time and again that “gangs” of “stalkers” aka gang stalkers are ALL intelligence agency affiliated, operating in domestic spaces, targeting civilian populations.
So, who do you call when its the cop-callers and “informers” doing the dirt?
One of the primary concerns within the gang stalking dialectic is that law enforcement and other “responsible report taking outlets” mask the clandestine activity* of intelligence agencies operating on civilian populations. There are thousands of ways to report terror related activity, simply by searching “report terror/illegal activity” and filling in your favorite agency name after that term. The only problem though, is that gang stalking IS our own people doing it, to others of our own people, which is against the law of all western nations, and even the UN Human Rights Declaration.
This voyeurism based “hiding the ball” scheme is particularly rampant in the former democracies of the west, known today as the “Five Eyes,” “Nine Eyes,”or the “Fourteen Eyes” nations, and while some forms of it it take place in every developed country, never before has the world seen the international exploitation of entire communications networks on such a scale. This form of monitoring, and then, pursuing so-called legal channels of prosecution is known as “evidence laundering” and it looks like this below:
The Five Eyes pundits yammer on about how “the communists” of Russia want to close off their internet to foreign voyeurism, and nations like “communist” China struggle with simple “fair play” in an era of rampant spying by “democratic” nations via international fiber optic cables, going so far to call this last gasp of western Jewish-christian nations the ” axis of white supremacy,” a claim that has merit, as we see echoed in the Fort Worth Weekly article about targeted individuals, people like Tiffany Fontenot, who peddle junk science and unscientific garbage like “reverse speech.*”
These crackpots and pundits appear in force in that article to defend the practices of gang stalkers, including extra-judicial monitoring of human beings(read that article). All of this derives from police narratives, and all of it is based in pseudo-science, lies, and deceptions. Here is David Oates peddling his junk science, and here is crackpot Tiffany Fontenot peddling it too. This is important, because we also see her virulently attacking someone in the comments section of the article after her and her cyber-bullies refused to comment in that article.
The problem has been particularly highlighted since the western governments scrapped their constitutional protections in favor of totalitarian measures of a “capitalist surveillance state.”
Where once (some) people in democracies could (sort of) rely on civil liberties like free speech, due process and privacy protections–all of that was erased after 911. And what was put in its place was an intercontinental surveillance network that eradicated these protections for all citizens, backed by smear campaigns and harassment by these groups. And in turn, that put ordinary people in immediate and direct contact with intelligence agents and agencies who had weaponized the citizenry as little more than the mobs we read about in history books, but this time, armed with Fusion Centers and internet. The cat was out of the meme, and it was no longer just a joke on the internet-it was now a matter of the cat coming and crapping on your door.
Recently, I explored a few different “social engineering exploits” that were targeted at me by people in the USA and Britain, and I did some social engineering of my own, in order to prove my claims. Here is part of that here, where we see “linguistics”exploits, and social engineering exploits in action, as I gained a few (literally three followers) here at this blog, all of whom are intelligence community (IC )affiliated. I wont name them here yet, but you can look at my followers yourself.
Well, part of social exploits requires tracking and tracing gangs of stalkers, and one of the best ways to get them to reveal themselves is to start a free WordPress blog, where you talk about who they are, rather than blather on about “electronic weapons/aliens/flat earth!/LIZARD PEEPLE/ or PIZZAGATE!!!!“
Having done that, many times, I have learned a few things:
-the Gemalto hack was an exploit whose ripple effect is still being felt today, unlike the “Nokia” chipset exploit( a UK/British operation).
-they all use the number 12 or 13 symbolically, for a variety of purposes, especially derived from Jewish and christian mysticism; but also these numbers are used in other pagan, neo-pagan and so-called Satanic practices too.And, it appears in military and police practices too, where we see teams of IC agents and other secretive groups organizing around this number.
-they are all Mi5/JTRIG/CIA/NSA/DoD/Mossad affiliated (in the west). Examples can be found here, by searching “number thirteen; 13,” etc.
-they ALL talk a hard right game online (see the flat earth/PIZZAGATE reference above)
-they all have contacts in the IC, and form networks of current and former spies, primarily working in clandestine domestic theater, disguising that activity as “counterintelligence and terrorism.”
-they all use masking software/IP spoofing/online repositories to gather intel against their targets. Exploits as simple as using comment forums to collect IP addresses, to more complicated exploits like the NSA hack of Gemalto chipsets, which I will cover below.
*see the CIA Glossary of Intelligence Agency Terms at this link for terminology explanations.
**I am currently mapping an undersea cable network that goes from certain Asian nations to South America (with a few curious stops in between) and for some strange reason, onward to Britain and Israel, via the NSA. Feel free to write, and vindicate yourselves,and your activity on those cables, lol. But ALL gang stalking dialogues, no matter how bizarre they seem are actually intel operatives and spies talking in what I call “dialectic para-language” to each other. The old school intel agency right wing version of that christian dialectic of “reverse speech,” is where we see christian superstition extrapolating that coincidence is in fact “Satan, talking backwards,” or some other “mind control” and influence operation.The entire western narrative depends from exactly these forms of ignorant gibberish.
First and foremost, gang stalking as defined by police, military, and other surveillance state sources, including pro-prosecution psychologists and attorneys is quite different than how ordinary citizens, targeted activists, and western dissidents define gang stalking.
Related Stories: Gang stalking lawsuits are not called “gang stalking lawsuits” because the term gang stalking is used primarily by actual stalkers, nearly 100% are current and retired police, military, and intelligence agency affiliated. So what is the proper name? Look here as the DoJ prosecutes an actual “gang” of “stalkers” aka the eBay Cockroach Cult, and then, look here at how victims of Pasco County FL Sheriffs department stalking and harassment are now suing the sheriff over his gang stalking program of “predictive policing”
As such, it can be inferred that ordinary citizens, and those affiliated with the military industrial complex or security state funded sources define organized gang stalking differently because of a fundamental difference in purpose and perspective.
SO, nearly 100% of those who are provably current and former spies, police, firefighters, and community assets and their relatives who appear online and off as concerned citizens ALWAYS manage to use the bizarre terminology of “electronic weapons” and more gibberish that is associated with gang stalking, whereas actual persons who are targeted BY these people simply discuss their reactions to being followed, harassed, and so on.
As such, we can see that their are in fact, two distinct groups of people online who are involved in the discussion:
1- police, military, and state government affiliated people who yammer on about “electronic weapons, mind reading locusts, and aliens,” and then,
2- others who simply complain about bizarre activity directed at them by the groups above, ranging from what we see in the case of the eBay stalking lawsuit now being prosecuted by the US Department of Justice, to the well known case of Small Town Terrorism by Rick Krlich in Ohio, who was stalked by a small towns inner clique, ranging from firefighters to the police chief, and all of their friends and associates because he bought a house that the fire chief claimed as his own, without evidence.
Then, there are a few types of hybrid outliers that, when taken as a whole, comprise a substantial set of data indicating religious evangelism is also involved in the dialectic. Crackpots like Dr. Stella Immanuel who repeat bizarre claims of demon sex and electronic harassment by the forces of the devil.
This last group is in essence comprised of religious fanatics, and so on who also engage in the “electronic warfare” side of the dialogues, almost always with an evangelizing intention. Here is a link to Snopes.com, debunking Dr. Immanuel and her bizarre claims. UNsurprisingly, these outliers blur with the police/state factions of gibberish and psychobabble spewing crowd, as evidenced by Dr. Immanuels daughter Mima Fondong being cited in a Rotary Club newsletter *.
These various influences can easily be seen and deciphered in the many, many online blogs, videos, podcasts, and other media devoted to this topic online which is produced by current and former employees of the various US and British (and others known as the Five Eyes, FVEYs) intelligence services who comprise the gatekeeping mechanism surrounding this topic, in conjunction with various police and community assets.
Urban Dictionary–an online, democratic dictionary,* has tracked the evolution of the definition for over two decades, and the results indicate this bipolar narrative has taken on the following meanings:
gang stalkingGang Stalking is really a covert government or police investigation. It’s similar to Cointelpro or red squads, and it’s being used on a lot of innocent people to ruin them and make them look crazy. Gang Stalking is all about government disinformation, and using civilian spies/snitches to help with stalking and monitoring innocent people.
“Jim was placed under covert investigation by his employer because of his whistle-blowing. Mistakenly he termed it gang stalking, which made him sound crazy.”
Urban Dictionary online uses a similar process as those who created the Oxford dictionary used, which is to accept definitions from the population at large, and as demonstrated in the brilliant Mel Gibson film “The Professor and the Madman.” As such, Urban Dictionary satisfies the academic requirements and rigor followed by other esteemed dictionaries in the crafting of of defininitions.
Similarly to the phrase gang stalking, the top ranked definition in Urban Dictionarty defines organized stalking as such:
“Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a “ganging up” by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic “terrorizing” of an individual.”
These definitions, submitted by anonymous individuals, and “upvoted” overan extensive period of time, indicate the validity and stability of this perspective over time, as well as satisfy the academic, and legal, court room standard of defining words, phrases and ideas from a layman’s perspective.
*The Rotary Clubs and many other fraternal/sorority organizations are heavily involved in gang stalking, and I have documented that in many ways across many online and offline narratives and sources, including in my own case, where I was gang stalked by identifiable Rotarians, Lions club members, and others who comprise a sort of international syndicate of stalkers, and who were also implicated in the Hong Kong riots of 2014-2020.
After the riots, mainland China sanctioned many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who were integral to causing the so-called “pro-democracy” riots. You can glimpse that here as China sanctions the CIA-backed National Endowment for Democracy (NED) affiliated NGOs, and here is an example of how powerful and interconnected these NGOs are.
The problem with the stance and posture by the NGOs is that they do not stand for actual democracy, but in fact, religious “freedom” which is in fact just religious-mob rule, as we see with the lawlessness of gang stalking. I documented that in real time as I was myself stalked by these various mobs. That work, evidence, and documentation can be seen at https://researchorganizedgangstalking.org