Bizarre dialogues online, gang stalking, and a reply to Bobbi Peitsch: you lost me at ” non-consensual microchip.”

Nearly everything you read about gang stalking, or the video’s online is absolute garbage. So, journalists and related fields must source watch those who claim to be experts in the field, and, take a look at “the nations opinion leader” the New York Times on that topic–a real eye opener in how “black propaganda” works, and what kind of people participate in it.

Many have likened gang stalking to a “mind control” operation, which has some basis in fact, because it is an “influence operation” as defined by public relations and journalism standards. And, the evidence of “influence operations” is right there in the NYT, and other places, although gang stalking lawsuits are starting to come forwards, as we see the recent prosecutions by the Department of Justice here, here, here, and other lawsuits to that effect, like those targeting the Pasco County, FL sheriff, who targeted children, and his own deputies in his “intelligence led predictive policing” scheme.

It is also a time-sucking rabbit hole, which will indeed “control your mind” for awhile. But for some, it’s not voluntary, as actual targeted individuals have no choice but to become involved in the dialectic–that is a separate post, and I will stick with the case at hand.

So, recently I criticized a “#fakeTI” Bobbi Pietsch, for claiming that she has an “a non-consenting electronic implant in her shoulder.” Dr. Eric Karlstrom Emeritus Professor of California State University had brought her case to my attention.

And, that woman Bobbi Pietsch responded, and I thank her for her response.

Bobbi: I am open to evidence, if you have any–which you don’t because of that one word “non-consenting.” You have been going on about this online for so long that you either put up or shut up with your “chip.”

Either a) you have a chip implant as many people and their pets do these days, or b) you have something else going on, which defies logical or scientific explanations, by your own testimony and your work online.

In a bi-polar world, your narrative might suck a few people in, and you might be interested to know that dozens of people from Canada, Israel, Ireland, the UK, Australia, the USA, the Netherlands, Norway, France, Germany all clicked in here today–I mean, undoubtedly you are a popular lady with some folks. But life isn’t just a binary–so there’s also letters c-z to be covered, and I dont want to waste to much time on it.

Let’s just look at c) once you know you have a problem, its your problem, regardless of who caused it.

Think of it like this: someone sneezes in your face, and you catch the cold. While indeed its is their fault–and non-consensual–the rest is yours to deal with. Its up to you to chomp down a few bulbs of garlic, and some chicken soup after that, and get over your cold–because it is YOURS now.

But you are not doing that. Instead, like all agency limited hangouts, and propaganda, the things you say are about 90% until….until we bump into the gibberish about RFID microchips–a problem that is easy to solve–yet you don’t solve it, leading others. like myself, to call you a “phony” and a “#fakeTI.”

I didn’t call you that out of disrespect, I called you that so that others who encounter your narrative can be careful because you avoid simple solutions to simple problems. While you obviously are not in the same category as crackpot James Lico, Ramola D., OSI Informers, Targeted Justice, or Tiffany Fontenot who still discusses the junk science of “reverse speech analysis,” you are not fully genuine, IMHO.

WE agree in substance to a lot of data points, listed below, from Dr. Eric Karlstrom’s website. Yes, the CIA-FVEY-Fourteen Eyes-Israeli DARPA thing does involve colleges, univerities, Tavistock, Facebook, etc. Yes, these are real surveillance abuses and “influence operations” are indeed involved. But you lose any rational listener at “non-consensual.” And that’s just science, and a little linguistic analysis of one word indicates.

Hey–don’t zap the messenger, ok?

But if indeed you are tracing cables and connections between institutions that are allied with the police and surveillance state, keep up the good work! Its real, what they are doing. But leave the “brain zappers” out of it, so that rational people can look in once in awhile, and think to themselves “yeah, I think I want to engage with this topic.”

I myself am engaged with tracing a “gang” of “stalkers” from Peru, Ecuador, the USA, into and out of Asia, via Cambodia, Jpan, Taiwan, Australia, Indonesia, Singapore, etc.

Evidence is necessary, and I provide it in all of my work–please look at the cases mentioned above, or the local “predictive policing” case where a bunch of total cowards ( a gang of police, retired police, prosecutors, and their relatives and associates, EXACTLY as ROGS Analysis predicts) tried to Taser Ahmaud Arbery with an “electronic weapon” two years before they murdered him with a car and a shotgun. Indeed–targeting is very real..

But what you are doing by claiming chip implants is the opposite, and I think you know that.

From Eric Karlstroms website, whereupon he analyses your claims:

Highlights From Video by Sh P (Bobbie Peitch, Canadian TI/forensic cyber researcher):

Peitsch: This is the network of the NDP (New Democratic Party), which is the labor party of Canada. I’m going to show you their computer routing. They are routing to military contractors in my network. And these military contractors directly link to Palo Alto (Stanford Research Institute) and clearly specialize in RFID, and data gathering, and body area networks. It’s a research center…. You can see Halliburton routing information here. That’s military contractors. You can look up the ASN numbers. You will find there are multiple political parties routing to military contractors. So are your hospitals. So are your clinics. Everybody is getting paid, except for the victims.

This is all of the routing pertaining to the World Economic Forum. Montreal is playing a really big role in this.

This is 20 years old. They are routing to Deutsche Telekom AG,, George Soros (Level 3 Parent, LLC), Tellia Company AB (Canada), Vodafone Group PLC (Netherlands), TELEFONICA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (Switzerland), Zayo Bandwidth (Germany), NTT America, Inc., GTT Communications Inc. which are companies from the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands. All of these are people that are actually involved in targeting. All of them.

If you are a targeted individual, you (should) know by now you are on ASN 1335 which is routed directly to the United Kingdom, probably the Tavistock Institute. I’ve found out by doing different digs that Tavistock has tons and tons of different companies listed in them. And these route to…. Google. Perfect masking system.

Connectivity of ASN numbers show MCI Communications/Verizon, Sprint, AT&T Services, Deutsche Telecom AG, TELECOM ITALIA SPARKLE S.p.A., PCCW Global Inc., Liberty Global B.V. These guys are all involved in targeting. I submitted that to the International Criminal Court 6 months ago. (Shows over 100 participating companies and universities).

… The Australian Academic and Research Network clearly specializes in cybernetics. I am routed to Australia Education Network around the clock because I have non-consenting RFID in my body. That clearly means that the NPD, the labor party of Canada, is supporting educational systems, military contractors and military contractors within the education system are targeting retirees, persons that become disabled. This is a fact. I have this evidence from me working at an educational institution and their network engineer transmitting (my) data to all over the world, including India.

Now why would a K-12 education system be transmitting privy data around the clock with network engineers and dealing with military contractors? Well, somebody’s getting paid, and it’s definitely not the workers, the injured people, or the students.

I have cybernetics systems in my body. I have full evidence of this. We have x-rays, we have tissue destruction, we’ve got RF readings from an apaco. These are abnormal. The body does not give readable RFIC signals.

The Mystery of the Immaculate Concussion

Electronic Weapons, aka “Directed Energy Weapons” are a staple in the Gang stalking dialectic, and news outlets ranging from Forbes, to GQ Magazine have begun to discuss it out loud.

He was a senior CIA official tasked with getting tough on Russia. Then, one night in Moscow, Marc Polymeropoulos’s life changed forever. He says he was hit with a mysterious weapon, joining dozens of American diplomats and spies who believe they’ve been targeted with this secret device all over the world—and even at home, on U.S. soil. Now, as a CIA investigation points the blame at Russia, the victims are left wondering why so little is being done by the Trump administration.

By Julia IoffeOctober 19, 2020

Journalists must learn to sourcewatch and gatekeep those who put themselves forwards as professional pundits in the gang stalking dialectic.

I do not write about any electronic weapons related material in the gang stalking dialectic UNLESS there is science, and news reporting on that topic, because there are just too many crackpots and conspiracy nutters writing gibberish like this, and this on that topic. Or, when people like Dr. Eric Karlstrom writing as he does about wiretaps and speculating about how our networks all run through various CIA/FVEYs funded switched routers.

So, that said, electronic weapons are real, and I have personally encountered them on three occasions. The question is: how to document it, and how to report on these cases? The example above is one such case, and another excellent example can be found here, in the story of targeted diplomats, those diplomats likely are Jewish- neocon-christians who, in my opinion probably should be targeted with investigation, because they “pop up ” in the background of so any mass shootings across America these days.

This background work is evidenced by the narrative that runs in the media, and then, the web scrubbing of the shooters Facebook and other SOCMED immediately following the event, which deliberately hides evidence of what provocateurs were cyber stalking and harassing them on their pages. Behind hiding evidence and moving goal posts, the “un- naming” of people who become radicalized mass shooters smacks of cultist belief systems, and dark ritualistic religion. Here is one such cultist pseudo-scientific tome’ by Mona Charen demanding that media not name mass shooters, and incel butter knife wielding car crashers.

There are currently two competing theories about the nature of the electronic weapons that are reported to have been encountered by US spies and diplomats around the world:

1-that its possible some of the symptoms reported by various persons ranging from diplomats and covert CIA spooks to tourists could be related to pesticides, and “organophosphate poisoning” is the cause (consider the source of this theory)

2-yup, its an electronic weapon–but only the “bad guys” like Russia and China, and of course “terrorists” of ever morphing and nebulous “threat levels” would use them. Certainly the morally pure, baby-bombing, depleted uranium salting, child porn distributing Jewish-christian confabulation of the Five Eye’s Nations would never do such a thing, right?

The thing is, in spy-world, what comes around goes around. Its impossible to call a spade a spade on a rigged roulette table full of hidden players who do really bad things. Regardless of the politics involved (and if you read through the highlighted piece about senior CIA intelligence agent Mark Polymeropoulos on a self guided tour to Moscow (his rank was equivalent to a four star general)–we see that politics is front and center in these cases of who gets targeted.

So what we see in actuality is that the right/left wings of the Jewish-christian western narrative, and their Hydra’s and Medusa’s of related affiliates compete for both theoretical superiority, but also valuable newspaper inches and web clicks.The centrist position is to consult all of the online gibberish written between 911 and today, and seek clues as to the origins and political, corporate, and intelligence affiliations of the writers, and then, consult the verified science for comparison.

What you will find is that many of the early 2003-2013 era reports are actually current and former military, police, and a hodgepodge of military contractors, cold case investigators, and many others in those circles talking to each other , and trying to sound as nutty as they can possibly sound. These claims range from the totally bizarre “they’re zapping my vagina with directed energy weapons, forcing me to have orgasms all day!!”

Related Story: Electronic vagina zapping and the zappers that can do it is like, a real thing, but not in context to gang stalking. Read “The Orgasmatron: Strange tale of a pleasure implantfrom the BBC

The Orgasmatron is an actual electronic implant that can actually zap your junk at the flick of a button

Amongst those that I documented using simple OSINT and SOCMINT, I have discovered:

-US Security industry contractors ranging from helicopter leasing agents, to bridge builders and oil reserve exploration corporations involved, and those as direct beneficiaries of the federal or US military contracting apparatus.

-actual spooks and spies as we see with so much of the Targeted Justice crew

-lots and lots of police from local departments who are hosting military contractors who are trying to sell their various toys that target civilian populations

-curiously, lots of women who work in “leadership development” and other HR related fields, stacking the deck in Human Resources departments at all major corporations

-lots and lots of “cold case investigators” and more from related fields. In fact, the notorious New York Times hit piece “They See Gangs of Stalkers...” where Dr. Lorraine Sheridan of Curtin University quoted “anonymous poll respondents” flush with all of the same people named above is one such “cold case investigator” herself. And, like many sadists and other institutional bullies, she also works in her states prison system too. Junk science, and biased research is a hallmark in these cases where actual stalkers claim they are victims; or where they assist this illegal practice and its practitioners, as noted in the Fort Worth Weekly piece “Gang Stalkers” by Teri Webster.

Here is more about Source Watching the disinformation, junk science, and psychobabble from sources in the gang stalking dialectic.