“An Open Letter to Dr. Mike Wood:  gang stalking denialist, or…?

During the run-up to the election cycle in 2016, where President Donald Trump was elected, the media and its pundits were very active attempting to mask the practice of “political gang stalking, and trying to call it a delusion. Most famously, favorite CIA news outlets like the New York Times, and others ran garbage stories like this….

UPDATE: I have tried repeatedly to contact Mr. Wood, to no avail. No reply. He simply will not talk about his irresponsible blog posts at www.conspiracytheorypsychology.com, where he and others seek to sell books by exploiting the stories of victims of gang stalking. I will soon add him to my “Source-watching in the gang stalking dialectic” list as yet another gang stalking denialist. These people are contributing to mass shootings across the west, and they are dangerous.

Buthis blog has many victims and whistle blowers presenting their cases, many of which are affirmed by the replies. People stalked by church groups; people stalked by state unemployment bureaus, military whistle blowers, “community policing” victims and others still are commenting there, and describing the bizarre behaviors and other antics of their stalkers, despite Mike Woods abandonment of that thread–it makes one wonder, what is the responsibility of the PhDs when it comes to gang stalking cases that make headlines?. Dr. Mike Wood, from this day forward, is truly a shitbag, and a shill, having abandoned his own forum, and ethical responsibility on this topic.

Then, later, the author of that piece, Mike McPhate, went on record much later discussing “gangs of police” who are indeed stalkers–and he placed that at number 13 in his newsletter–by “coincidence,” no doubt! The meaning of the numbers 12 and 13 in the gang stalking dialectic online..

Related Story: many doctors, paramedics, and others in the “health industries” and “health journalism” are actual gang stalkers and gas lighters. Here is just one of many examples, as Tiffany Fontenot targets a low level sex offender. But, once we weed their kind of hard-right garbage out, we find good solid medicine that actually uses “brain implants” to help people. The linked story is about how scientists created a “brain chip” to help a paralyzed man write, a major breakthrough in technology that will benefit many. We must separate these types of stories from other stories about actual “medical mafia’s” in order to analyze gang stalking narratives, and separate the junk science from the facts and evidence.

Hi, I want to start by apologizing for being kind of an asshole during your tenure at Conspiracytheorypsychology,biz. I was posting as Joe, and Joseph Blowseph, etc., and I realize that perhaps you think I was being a jerk.

It was intentional, TBH, but not directed at you per se, but rather the rhetoric and its divisive nature, and especially that you denied the experience of many targets of agency brutality.

For that I apologize, if I offended you in my zeal to provide validation for actual targeted individuals, as opposed to the “fake TI’s” online who are nearly 100% current and former police, military, and intelligence agents and their flying monkeys . They are the shitbags who ramble on about “electronic weapons, aliens, flat earth, lizard people and microchips.”

That said, are you following the cases of Ahmaud Arbery, the Pasco County FL gang stalking lawsuits, where the sheriff and his “gang” “targeted” children, or the eBay case being prosecuted by the US federal government?

Classic gang stalking.

And, now, the Tampa Bay Times has won Harvard University’s Nieman Center Taylor Award for “fairness in journalism,” because of that reportage in a series of articles called “Targeted.”

And the Fort Worth Weekly journalist Teri Webster has now covered gang stalking too in articles titled “Gangstalking,” and “Targeting Targeted Individuals,” by Teri Webster. In each story, she carefully brings to light the fact that gang stalkers are in fact current anf former military, police, county coroners, and others in their flying monkey orbit.

In other words–journalists are starting to win awards for writing about gang stalking. Does that surprise you? I have pushed this narrative for over four years among journalists, and now I am seeing results.

Are you ready to join the good guys on this topic yet? My Id initially believed that you could help turn this dialectic mire around, but my ego says I might have offended your ego; so my superego urges me to this apology, in order so that I can (hopefully) get you to take a second look at this topic.

Regardless, I will continue to write about this topic, influence journalists, and discuss you as either a gang stalking denialist, or a gang stalking realist. Your choice. I really want you to choose the facts, supported by the evidence I mentioned above.

This email will be published as ” An Open Letter to Dr. Mike Wood:  gang stalking denialist, or…?”

Best regards–
ROGS

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother files one million dollar criminal conspiracy lawsuit: Gang stalking lawsuits are not called “gang stalking lawsuits”

Just after the US federal government filed hate crime charges against the “gang” of men who “stalked”, and murdered Ahmaud Arbery, his mother Wanda Cooper-Jones filed a one million dollar lawsuit alleging conspiracy and coverup. These gang stalking lawsuits are NOT about the money, they are about bringing this practice of “gangs of police” and other cockroaches into the light.

Regardless of anything–anything–at their heart, gang stalking cases are policing gone wrong, and all of it involves over-reach and illegal activity on the part of the police. In the Arbery case several prosecutors refused to prosecute it as a homicide, because it was in fact a case of illegal police gang stalking, and an actual coverup occured. other words, gang stalking IS actual conspiracy at each and every level, and this lawsuit seeks to prove that.

In every way, we see the full power of the state directed at the powerless, which is pretty bad, but accenting that are secret gangs of police and their associates who act as vigilante’s. In Ahmaud Arbery’s case, reports state that these police and prosecutors targeted and stalked him for many years before they finally murdered him. AT one point, two years before they killed him, they also tried to Taser him without any provocation whatsoever.

And–that was an actual conspiracy, not a “conspiracy theory” at all. To have irresponsible psychologists popping up in the media and calling gang stalking “delusional” helps exactly no one, and as we see with Dr.s Lorraine Sheridan, David V. James, and Christine Sarteschi running cover for illegal policing tactics only perpetuates these ACTUAL conspiracies, and psychologists are indeed “in on it” as they participate in this practice. Have a look at Dr. Mike Woods blog Conspiracytheorypsychology.com to see him gaslight and deny that cases like this exist, and gets his ass solidly handed to him too, by actual victims.

Forbes–the worlds premier money magazine– asked attorney Lee Merritt, who is representing Arbery’s mother Jackie Cooper, what does money have to do with the case? And the answer is quite surprising.

So, to answer the question “who finances the gang stalkers,” lets look closer at this case, and the money problem of policing.

The Money Story Behind Police Power: Civil Rights Attorney Lee Merritt Explains

Morgan Simon

In a country equally driven by its politics and its economy, there’s always a money story behind the story. So what does money have to do with effective policing and police accountability?

The Mystery of the Immaculate Concussion

Electronic Weapons, aka “Directed Energy Weapons” are a staple in the Gang stalking dialectic, and news outlets ranging from Forbes, to GQ Magazine have begun to discuss it out loud.

He was a senior CIA official tasked with getting tough on Russia. Then, one night in Moscow, Marc Polymeropoulos’s life changed forever. He says he was hit with a mysterious weapon, joining dozens of American diplomats and spies who believe they’ve been targeted with this secret device all over the world—and even at home, on U.S. soil. Now, as a CIA investigation points the blame at Russia, the victims are left wondering why so little is being done by the Trump administration.

By Julia IoffeOctober 19, 2020

Journalists must learn to sourcewatch and gatekeep those who put themselves forwards as professional pundits in the gang stalking dialectic.

I do not write about any electronic weapons related material in the gang stalking dialectic UNLESS there is science, and news reporting on that topic, because there are just too many crackpots and conspiracy nutters writing gibberish like this, and this on that topic. Or, when people like Dr. Eric Karlstrom writing as he does about wiretaps and speculating about how our networks all run through various CIA/FVEYs funded switched routers.

So, that said, electronic weapons are real, and I have personally encountered them on three occasions. The question is: how to document it, and how to report on these cases? The example above is one such case, and another excellent example can be found here, in the story of targeted diplomats, those diplomats likely are Jewish- neocon-christians who, in my opinion probably should be targeted with investigation, because they “pop up ” in the background of so any mass shootings across America these days.

This background work is evidenced by the narrative that runs in the media, and then, the web scrubbing of the shooters Facebook and other SOCMED immediately following the event, which deliberately hides evidence of what provocateurs were cyber stalking and harassing them on their pages. Behind hiding evidence and moving goal posts, the “un- naming” of people who become radicalized mass shooters smacks of cultist belief systems, and dark ritualistic religion. Here is one such cultist pseudo-scientific tome’ by Mona Charen demanding that media not name mass shooters, and incel butter knife wielding car crashers.

There are currently two competing theories about the nature of the electronic weapons that are reported to have been encountered by US spies and diplomats around the world:

1-that its possible some of the symptoms reported by various persons ranging from diplomats and covert CIA spooks to tourists could be related to pesticides, and “organophosphate poisoning” is the cause (consider the source of this theory)

2-yup, its an electronic weapon–but only the “bad guys” like Russia and China, and of course “terrorists” of ever morphing and nebulous “threat levels” would use them. Certainly the morally pure, baby-bombing, depleted uranium salting, child porn distributing Jewish-christian confabulation of the Five Eye’s Nations would never do such a thing, right?

The thing is, in spy-world, what comes around goes around. Its impossible to call a spade a spade on a rigged roulette table full of hidden players who do really bad things. Regardless of the politics involved (and if you read through the highlighted piece about senior CIA intelligence agent Mark Polymeropoulos on a self guided tour to Moscow (his rank was equivalent to a four star general)–we see that politics is front and center in these cases of who gets targeted.

So what we see in actuality is that the right/left wings of the Jewish-christian western narrative, and their Hydra’s and Medusa’s of related affiliates compete for both theoretical superiority, but also valuable newspaper inches and web clicks.The centrist position is to consult all of the online gibberish written between 911 and today, and seek clues as to the origins and political, corporate, and intelligence affiliations of the writers, and then, consult the verified science for comparison.

What you will find is that many of the early 2003-2013 era reports are actually current and former military, police, and a hodgepodge of military contractors, cold case investigators, and many others in those circles talking to each other , and trying to sound as nutty as they can possibly sound. These claims range from the totally bizarre “they’re zapping my vagina with directed energy weapons, forcing me to have orgasms all day!!”

Related Story: Electronic vagina zapping and the zappers that can do it is like, a real thing, but not in context to gang stalking. Read “The Orgasmatron: Strange tale of a pleasure implantfrom the BBC

The Orgasmatron is an actual electronic implant that can actually zap your junk at the flick of a button

Amongst those that I documented using simple OSINT and SOCMINT, I have discovered:

-US Security industry contractors ranging from helicopter leasing agents, to bridge builders and oil reserve exploration corporations involved, and those as direct beneficiaries of the federal or US military contracting apparatus.

-actual spooks and spies as we see with so much of the Targeted Justice crew

-lots and lots of police from local departments who are hosting military contractors who are trying to sell their various toys that target civilian populations

-curiously, lots of women who work in “leadership development” and other HR related fields, stacking the deck in Human Resources departments at all major corporations

-lots and lots of “cold case investigators” and more from related fields. In fact, the notorious New York Times hit piece “They See Gangs of Stalkers...” where Dr. Lorraine Sheridan of Curtin University quoted “anonymous poll respondents” flush with all of the same people named above is one such “cold case investigator” herself. And, like many sadists and other institutional bullies, she also works in her states prison system too. Junk science, and biased research is a hallmark in these cases where actual stalkers claim they are victims; or where they assist this illegal practice and its practitioners, as noted in the Fort Worth Weekly piece “Gang Stalkers” by Teri Webster.

Here is more about Source Watching the disinformation, junk science, and psychobabble from sources in the gang stalking dialectic.