Friends in “high places”: Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco flaunted access to power, highlighting the problem of “the Jesus” and sheriffs department gang stalking

In the Tampa Bay Times series “Targeted” we get a glimpse of how sheriffs departments are using gang stalking to “harass targeted individuals until they move away or sue.” These departments are all over the USA and they act with brutal impunity–until now.

This has been enabled across the country because Jewish-christian’s –or those who have co-opted that label–do not believe in law, or civil rights, or due process. Using a system called “intelligence led predictive policing” these people have placed CIA and other intelligence agency designed and engineered technology at every internet switch, and every street camera.

A system which is so nefarious, invasive and bizarre that only window ledge slobbering voyeuristic deviants could have designed it. And now, they have invaded the public schools, and are in fact, using these technologies to track our children. What kind of deviants target and harass children? The same great minds that distribute child pornography to every corner of the globe with an urgency that belies ullterior motives. We must ask ” why–and WHO is doing such dirty deeds in order yto achieve WHAT purpose? The Multi-Alphabet agencies and their Hydra’s and Medusa’s of psychological operators in the FVEYs scheme are doing it, with little doubt, that’s who.

So, when we examine who targets children–and why they do it–we discover entire hidden industries that exploit children inn a variety of sickly, creative ways. There was the Kids For Cash scandal, and the movie that documented it; and every day across western nations we see this kind of child exploitation, which causes any rational observer to wonder : why do naked kids on film produce more outrage than ” sliced, and diced and medicated, and deliberately made-dyysfunctional kids, who have been used and abused by international medical mafias?”

Well, lets peek at the hypocrisy in the wizards of spin, in an otherworldly Oz, for one example of a “gang stalking lawsuit” from Pasco County Florida, USA. These people are exploiting children at the most vulnerable level–in their own homes:

The man behind the machine

Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco built a controversial data-driven approach to policing. He also built a wide circle of powerful friends who don’t question his tactics.

Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco was once asked under oath how he had landed two high-level posts in state government.

“It was the connections that I had made,” he said bluntly.

“I mean, you didn’t have to like go and interview along with a hundred other people to get the job or anything?” an attorney pressed.

“No, ma’am,” he said.

Later that month, he told a reporter: “I’m very blessed to have friends that are in high offices.”

What are the “Five Eyes” of spying, and what is “generational targeting” in the gang stalking dialectic?

The Five Eyes, a part of what the NSA calls internally its “global network” have their dirty fingerprints all over the latest spying scandal engulfing New Zealand, writes exiled Kiwi journalist Suzie Dawson.

The media response has predictably walked the safest line – focusing on the egregiousness of the victimisation of the least politically involved targets such as earthquake insurance claimants and child abuse survivors, and honing in on the very bottom rungs of the culpability ladder. They are as yet failing to confront the international and geopolitical foundations that lie under the surface of outsourced state-sponsored spying in New Zealand.

The truth is that the roots of the issue go far deeper than subcontractors like Thompson and Clark. The chain of complicity and collusion leads far beyond the head of any department or agency, including the Head of the State Services Commission. It goes beyond even the Beehive, the New Zealand Parliament and the Office of the Prime Minister.

At its core, this scandal is a reflection of fundamental flaws in the very fabric of intelligence gathering practices in New Zealand, its infrastructure and network – where the collected data flows, whom the collection of that data serves and to which masters our intelligence services ultimately answer.

This was written in 2019, just as major media began to address the “Five Eyes” spy apparatus that targets journalists specifically, and with a vengeance. It is much related to this kind of activity here.

On one hand, a convenient foil is to claim that “the communists” and the “pedophiles” and the “terrorists” are everywhere in order to occlude intelligence agency abuses of our own citizens; but on the other, to cover over genuine abuse of dissenters/activists/atheists/etc. by our own agencies.

So, what is “generational targeting” in this context? Well, Julian Assange is one prominent example, but there are tens of thousands (growing into the millions) more.

I am old enough to recall the pre-internet and how agencies called “data basing individuals” it a conspiracy theory. And look, here we are, with all FVEYs nations outed as doing just that, across time and space, targeting our freedom of association, our opportunities and more, and all of that without due process of law, or civil liberties challenges anywhere of note. Not a theory at all, but definitely a conspiracy

Here is one man’s story, told in main stream media, a story of exactly that, targeting a child, grown into a man.

Pedophiles? Maybe.They tracked and traced a child from pre-puberty into adulthood and further.

Voyeurs? No doubt, by definition.

Perverts of due process and civil liberties. Most definitely. “They” traced, tracked, and data based New Zealand Green Party MP Keith Locke from the early age of 11.

The sordid tale of the phrase “pedophiles in the deep state,” and intelligence agencies. Welcome to the double talking para=language of spooks online in the gang stalking dialectic!

The revelation in 2009 that Green MP Keith Locke had been spied on since age 11 caused an uproar and prompted an inquiry into SIS surveillance. Now, he writes, the SIS has been forced to apologise for calling him ‘a threat’ in internal documents.