The recent Pasco County Florida gang stalking lawsuit where cops targeted children had a predecessor: Squitieri et al v. Nocco et al, which invokes civil applications of the RICO Act

Police and sheriff’s departments across the country that use “intelligence led predictive policing” are using a model designed by the CIA and other spy agencies to target terrorists. Now, these programs target political adversaries, low level offenders, and little children–in their schools!

When I first experienced gang stalking, I was inundated with calls from the various police and firefighter benevolent associations in an area of the country where defunding a corrupt police force is on the ballot this November, as the “Yes4Minneapolis” initiative gathers steam. And so, my commentary is not ordinary commentary either, as I was in contact with Derek Chauvin and his gang of MPD on many occasions, long before George Floyd was murdered there.

In fact, I know many members of that police department inside and outside of their “gangs,” for reasons that I discussed here on many occasions. Indeed, the police union head in that area is an associate and beer buddy of the Hell’s Angel’s, and many other “bike clubs.” So I know what police gangs are too.

All that aside, a couple years before the Pasco County sheriff was sued for gang stalking children, there was another lawsuit, and it also invoked the RICO Act to try to curb corrupt police. RICO can be applied in either a criminal or civil context. The filing that came to that gang stalking sheriffs department before others sued is Squitieri et al v. Nocco et al, and it reads like a story written in the last century in a dystopian totalitarian eastern bloc nation. But it’s not an ancient tale of Stalinist repression: it’s modern gang stalking in the USA.

Police harassing residents, and failing in their harassment, locking them up under the “Baker Act” aka a 5150, or mental health evaluation. Using helicopters to hover over peoples houses all day and night, or hovering those same copters over a “body farm” to terrorize students; and many more bizarre claims, that until just a couple short decades ago were unthinkable in any civilized democracy, but that are now common news stories. These cases are indeed bizarre, and just describing them can make a listener wonder which is crazier–the story teller or the cops doing these things.

Its not a small list of plaintiffs either, as it invokes the civil RICO Act against memmbers of that sheriffs department “gang.” From DocketBird.com

CHRISTOPHER J. SQUITIERI, JOHN HORNING, ANTHONY PEARN, JAMES STEFFENS, CHRISTOPHER STARNES, CHERYL HAZELTON,NIKOLAUS KRIZ, AARON ZIEGLER, SHANE METZLER, ROYCE RODGERS, CLIFF BALTZER, SEAN GIBSON, BRYAN SIKES, EDWARD LAPE, BRANDON MARCHIONE, DEAN MARIANI, RICHARDBYNUM, CHARLES KEPPEL JR, NICHOLAS SCRIMAand BRIAN KOZERA….

alleges upon facts and belief as follows: I. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS This is a Civil RICO claim which requires Plaintiffs to demonstrate that the Defendants have engaged in a “pattern” of misconduct (called “racketeering” under the RICO statutes). A Page 4 of 228 27 PageID 619 “Pattern of racketeering activity” requires that at least two acts of racketeering activity are committed within ten (10) years of each other. The Civil Action for RICO is defined in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1964 (c): “Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may. . . recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. . . .” Section 1962 has four (4) subparts and generally prohibits the use of income obtained from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to purchase, establish, operate, or participate in the affairs of any enterprise in interstate or foreign commerce. Florida’s RICO Act mirrors the Federal RICO Act.

Read more from the docket here: https://www.docketbird.com/court-documents/Squitieri-et-al-v-Nocco-et-al/Amended-Complaint/flmd-8:2019-cv-00906-00007

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27851155/Squitieri_et_al_v_Nocco_et_al

https://www.docketbird.com/court-documents/Squitieri-et-al-v-Nocco-et-al/Temporary-restraining-order/flmd-8:2019-cv-00906-00104

Keith LaBella Esq. was the first to suggest applying the RICO act to “organized gang stalking.” Now, a trend in which we see the Pasco County lawsuits invoking RICO, and a host of other constitutional violations

Keith La Bella Esq., writes over at www.gangstalkingismurder,wordpress.com, and he was the first person to ask that we apply “RICO” statutes to gang stalking cases. Unlike “do-nothing”ultra-right organizations–and likely stalkers– like TargetedJustice.biz, LaBella’s efforts are now paying off. The statute designed to police “mobsters”, “mafia’s” an other “gangs” is now applicable to “police gangs” who use intelligence led, predictive policing to harass people.

Keith La Bella is well known amongst genuine targeted individuals, because he is one himself, unlike these liars and frauds listed here, and here, who ramble on incessantly about “directed energy weapons, cell phone tower brain zappers!! aliens, and ghosts!!!” and who threaten lawsuits like Targeted Justice, but never sue anyone. These frauds all share the commonality of being retired spies, cops, and others associated with those fields, and manage to squash all that electronic brain zapper crap into the first paragraph of every so-called lawsuit they file, guaranteeing that they will not be taken seriously by any court anywhere. These groups are an offshoot in every way of President Ronald Reagan’s morality crusades–the war on drugs, the war on porn, etc.

Related Story: arch conservatives are known for double talk ad gibberish. Have a look back into the dark ages at Reagan’s War on Porn

But here below is one of the first lawsuits targeting sheriff’s departments and others who targeted children, brought forward by the Institute for Justice. These lawsuits invoke the RICO Act statutes, and a handful of other civil rights violations , and, none of these actual gang stalking lawsuits mention brain eating aliens, or mind reading locusts–go figure.ANd none of these lawsuits have yet targeted these other forms of child abuse, but those are coming soon.

From the Tampa Bay Times, the series Targeted chronicles these first of their kind lawsuits:The U.S. Department of Education has opened an investigation into whether the Pasco school district broke federal law by sharing student data with the Sheriff’s Office. [April 19, 2021]

While these are the first of their kind to reach main stream news coverage, many have come before them, and LaBella’s lawsuit was the first to discuss these abuses and invoke RICO statutes. Here is the docket filing from 2011 for his lawsuit against the FBI, and here is a bit more about his request, and its results, and LaBella himself writes here. Note that his Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI and other organizations netted an interesting result: of the cases of stalking reported, some 13% included three or more perpetrators, a statistic that is substantial, and widely circulated in the TI community.

My problem is documenting “gangs of police, and their affiliated stalkers,” not merely sorting out the garbage blogs and videos from the real cases of gang stalking. If ever we saw how democracy is undermined, it is BY these retired police, and their agencies. So, because organizations like Targeted Justice are big budget, their form of gibberish gets higher rankings in Google, et al.

They even feature the same ultra-right wing “mind control” psychobabbling suspects such as failed James Randi JREF Dr. Colin Ross who claims he can shoot laser beams out of his eye, and Dr. Robert Duncan, former CIA. It is these crackpots with agency connections that have stopped any progress on this issue since the height of the Satanic Panic era of the Moral Majority.

The FBI created Infragard, a secret and secretive group of over 80.000 people who work in strategic positions like IT, and corporate leadership management, etc, spying on citizens, and creating secret dossiers which they pass around, in order to skirt the rule of law. This type of activity is routine in nations that have foregone the rule of law, and to have this secretive group doing this at the bidding of the FBI reveals that no one in that organization believe in the rule of law, due process, or civil liberty, no different that so called totalitarian police states or”communist nations.”

So, we see that police in the west are in fact, no better than communists by practice, and definition, and we see that clams of democratic rule of law are hollow, having been gutted and cooked by these same persons. But it isn’t communists that did this in the west–it is religious fascists whose apparently incredibly insecure and not-quite-all-knowing God demands a police and surveillance state. Faith indeed.

Even communist nations abide by the rule of law. And that is a significant statement, considering that western governments have co-opted the meaning of freedom as “religious freedom” while destroying every right and civil liberty enshrined in western constitutions. They have enshrined hatred of communism as their catalyst for world domination, which has now been turned inwards on their own people. The FVEYs spy apparatus, augmented by constant threat narrative PSYOP (and its black operations) is what underlies all of these claims, and the fake TI’s who endlessly spew disinformation surrounding them are just layers of fat.

Its time to cut it out.

Also read Where’s the Intelligence at the CIA,” as torture pornography produced during for the global elite’s 1% war in Iraq is dubiously shuffled around between agencies, hiding the ball from Congressional oversight.

The tale of the C.I.A.’s torture tapes grows longer, more twisted and interlaced. The list of question grows apace, too.

What part did members of Congress play? When were these tapes showing C.I.A. agents inflicting pain on their captives destroyed? Who destroyed them? On whose orders? What were the motives for doing so? Or is this yet one more C.I.A. ruse? We are dealing here with an institution of habitual mendacity.