We see that the narrative of ” mass shooters seek fame,” is not at all a realistic assessment, but rather, academic level complicity with ” deep narratives,” and the massive “war on terror” crisis public relations schemes across various institutions that are WOT beneficiaries.
There is very little truth, and lots of “ritual defamation” in such claims, because the so-called fame shooter only makes comment AFTER being stalked on social media by WOT operatives and others. Then, Big-Tech, in full complicity with the FBI and other agencies, deletes their postings. So in this sense, Big Tech is not only compliant, but complicit, because ALL of these guys are being monitored online at all times.
And we see that most strikingly in cases like Jared Loughner, who shot one of the darlings of gun control Gabriel Gifford’s, who he likely equated (and perhaps correctly) that she was a Stalinist type of gun grabber.
Loughner didn’t seek the limelight per se, but rather, sought to question the WOT propaganda system, and its “grammar” saying ‘What is government if words have no meaning?’ And of course, Psychology Today asked “What Kind of Psychosis” would cause a young man to question the WOTs war on words, and in a piece titled “The Language and Literature of Jared Loughner” the New Yorker correctly noted that his reading lists of favorite books rightly questioned the CIA/other agency affiliated authors that wrote them, including Joseph Heller of “Catch-22” fame, and others.
Loughner correctly stated at one point that the propaganda system in the US-FVEYs alliance was twisting and contorting “the meaning of words such as “terrorist,”
“The government is implying mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar [sic].”
To any rational person, that is clearly just a young scholar taking on “the narrative” with the limited tools that young scholars have. He wasn’t seeking “fame” but rather, seeking affirmation that the incredibly bizarre, anti-democracy WOT is indeed a war on words themselves, for which ample evidence exists. But to those who secretly hide behind our internet switches-aka gang stalkers–these words contradict their “mission”of chronic surveillance, and indict fre-thinking individuals as “terrorists,” at which point entire teams of internet trolls begin following and harassing internet speakers, online and off.
Further, no one has demonstrated that Loughner is either crazy for doing that, nor was he “seeking fame.” And certainly, Loughner is now locked away, far, far away from the insight of journalists, so that we can never ask him about such things. So, the pattern of “attacking the messenger” repeats in case after case of “fame seeking” mass shooters. Its a complete inversion of a persons narrative.
Related Story: A survivor of the Soviet era Russian Gulag system, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, wrote the most banned book in the history of the World, Two Hundred Years Together, and chronicled the incredibly high percentage of Jews who were responsible for soulless atrocities during that era, saying” … given the overwhelmingly Jewish composition of the top leadership during much of (the revolutionary) period, it is hardly surprising that “anti-Semitism” was deemed a capital offense (in Russia)” Yet he is also on record emphatically denying that it was exclusively a “Jewish conspiracy.”
And this is because history tends to erase the complicity of the various churches, and oligarchs. corporations and private interests–and especially their deviant “NGOs”– that work secretly to further their own agendas. Think of it this way: the Bank of England, the Anglican and the Catholic churches and their members definitely had a stake in destroying the Russian monarchy, because that’s simply what royalty does, as a basic business model.The same goes with mass shootings and gun control in the US today.
It is in the interests of these hidden powers to take away guns today, just as it was under Lenin/Stalin/Hitler, etc.
So, in cases like Robert Louis Dear, an abortion clinic shooter and self-styled “Warrior for the Babies” lived in the boonies, in a camper, with clear sight lines surrounding it. No doubt, he had been gang stalked, and no doubt because his anti-abortion message was intolerable. But he didn’t “seek fame.”
He sought privacy, and the right to first amendment protected speech. But the media narrative–highly informed by actual gangs of stalkers–seeks to “un-name” these men and boys, as we see with Rebbecah Traister at The Cut, seeking to “dehumanize” them. Keep in mind that her salary over there depends upon sticking with “the narrative” too, while managing to slip in a bit of racism in her narrative too–completely un-called for. And, she is a huge “gang stalking denialist,” too part of the DVIC narrative of a falsely correlated link between domestic violence and mass shootings.
Or in the case of DeWayne Craddock, the Virginia Beach shooter, who shot up a dozen gang stalking colleagues one of whom had called him a racial slur several years before his “rampage.” In all media, and narratives, he was a clean living man, who was clearly stalked by someone, or something at work, and at home. You can read the final report from the Virginia Beach P.D. here.
By all and every account, Mr. Craddock simply sought privacy. He wanted to be “left lone.” And, as a black male who worked at the level of city narrative, we see that he never sought the limelight, unless it was for city business.He had no web presence, or social media.And, he had camera’s pointed outside his home, because people were messing with his car.
And case after case of these incidents where the media is sought, it is to get help not for “mental illness,” but rather, to get attention to the fact that these individuals are indeed being spied on, stalked and harassed, as we saw with the recent Baltimore shooting by Everton Brown, who–oddly–had been smeared in the press several years before his event, and smeared because he protested as an individual.
Andrew Engledinger, the Accent Sign shooter in Minneapolis also apparently lived like a mouse, in a little house, before members of the media–a public relations magazine–showed up at his workplace at the direct request of his boss Reuven Rahamim, who was in fact a “media whore,” who constantly sought the limelight, doing anything he could for publicity. The photographers blasted camera’s in Engledingers face, and distributed those images across the world. Engledinger later killed his Israeli boss, while deliberately sparing others–his was a case of a “workplace harasser targeting mass shooter.”
Frequently, in these cases where the agency/academic smear runs in the pres that mass shooters are seeking fame or publicity, it is almost an upside down “Bizarro world” narrative where these murderers not only target those who have targeted them, but also, that whatever their “beliefs” are, bigger corporate interests manage to steal free publicity after these events.
And especially, keep an eye open in ALL mass shooting cases where the numbers 12 and 13 pop up in odd places. In Engledingers case, his parents were under the sway of the mental health industry–and their many, many “12 step” or “12 week” programs–he “cut off contact with his family soon after he learned that his parents enrolled in the National Alliance on Mental Illness’s 12-week Family to Family course,”and so, then begins the mental health smear–that he was “paranoid.”
To sane people, familiar with the western dialectic, its plain that dysfunctional families scapegoat a member, and even more plain that when others seek “help” for you, its usually them who need it most–a well known patttern in the “family mental health” field. to any non-christian what these symbolic numbers mean, and they are recurring themes in “medical mafia” related advertising, especially all of the 12-Step programs that are a hundreds of billions of dollars industry, and the source of a few blogs about that exact topic: AA styled 12 step programs and gang stalking.( the woman who wrote that blog is learning disabled, so click her avatar for the more interesting stuff)
Whether its the “mental health” lobbyists, or the “domestic violence industrial complex,” or some “security company with security products” to sell, we see what a major publicity opportunity the press allows in these cases because in fact, crisis PR agents are managing the entire narrative.
This is clearly the case in the Ten Thousand Oaks shooter Ian Long, we see people who had bullied the guy turning up as “narrators” long after the initial bullying incident–and some calling him “quiet, not a bad guy,” which is frequently repeated in nearly ALL of these cases.
In Long’s case, his former track coach Dominique Colell showed up in interviews, post-mortem, telling a story about how she had stolen his cell phone, and forced him to “run 13 miles.” In that story, she turned it around and said that he had “attempted to rape her” as he grasped for his stolen phone, which she had hidden behind her back. Those 13’s are EVERYWHERE in these cases too. She herself is affiliated with the Lutheran sects and colleges.
Talk about Fame Whores! Indeed, Ms. Colell was a beauty queen pageant poser, and has her own side business as a “Chainsaw Chick.” Female bullies are also high on the narcissism scales, and the associated sociopathy that goes along with that. Female bullies and their enablers are indeed a real thing. So–who exactly hunted her down for such an interview–how did they know to get that “special quote?” Yup….and again, these are some “tough chicks,” and their “partners in crime” too.
Long by contrast, was said to be a loner, who avoided the limelight; and then, among his victims–a stunning amount of undercover or off-duty cops and security personnel too. ROGS Analysis predicts as much, because gangs of stalkers are 100% police and security persons, working in the “community policing” scam. And indeed–there is a war on America’s doors and gates, as we see in the Doorman Wars of Minneapolis.
So: who exactly is seeking the limelight in mass shooting cases? Say THEIR Names!
In the Ten Thousand Oaks shooting, it was clearly Ms. Colell with a special message about sexual harassment, and the number 13, for some reason. And that is a constant in these cases too, as one after another, ranging from the Portapique mass shooting by Gabriel Wortman, to the narrative of the Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen–the billion dollar domestic violence industry (DVIC) and its nefarious “advocates” can’t get their message into the news quick enough.
So much for the FBI/academic narrative that mass shooters “seek fame,” as most of the time, they just want gang stalking colleagues to leave them alone, and many of them have gone to great lengths to gain privacy, anonymity, and peace. But that’s not what they found, because even in solitude, gang stalkers indeed “will move in next door to you,” and wage harassment campaigns of all kinds. And Fusion Center’s will spy on you too, once your name is handed to them by any of the agencies, or their thousands of “security contractors” across America.
The entire narrative of the “fame seeking mass shooter” is an occult concoction with its roots in the middle east, long before the “war on terror,” and FBI/CIA/DIA influence operations in media and elsewhere–notably those roots are in earlier era Satanic Panic, and counter-terrorism related fake news; and the practice
It stems directly from “unnaming of evil” cultic practices in various Jewish-christian religions, and its practice viw No Notoriety, and other similar groups is directly related to that. Let me demonstrate that the “narrative of notoriety or fame-seeking” and its related topic of ritual unnaming comes from religion, junk science, and far right cultic presence in the US Intelligence counter-terrorism funding chain.
Related: American and other universities research is funded by the CIA and other “deep state” interests. We get a glimpse of the battle for the dialectic on this issue as two academics debate another academic, who is a fraud and a liar. So, Adam Lankford, a professor of criminology at the University of Alabama is one of many who have made these false claims that the US has more mass shooters than any other country, and that study–like so many of those studies, by many professors, ignores root causes, and also deliberatly obscures sources.
Lankford’s work–similar to David V. James and Lorraine Sheridan’s work–is pure poppycock, and his entire academic trails begs us to ask “who exactly is funding this guy’s research?”Regardless, Lohn R. Lott, Jr., from the Crime Prevention Research Center and Carlsile E. Moody from the College of William and Mary took on Lankford’s claims, and dragged a pro-police, dubiously funded cockroach into the open, in a paper from 2020 titled
Brought Into the Open: How the U.S. Compares to Other Countries in the Rate of Public Mass Shooters
“Adam Lankford (2016) asserted that the United States accounted for 31percent of the world’s public mass shooters over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012 “Click that link for insight into how the narrative of the mass shooter is itself a cash cow, bringing research grants to many professors who peddle junk science.
Here is the previous paper from Lankford that Lott and Moody were replying to “Confirmation That the United States Has Six Times Its Global Share of Public Mass Shooters, Courtesy of Lott and Moody’s Data” smugly gloating that he is right “nah, nah nah, nah booboo.”Conformation bias indeed.
The FBI-academic paper factory that continuously cranks out such junk science hinges on thin threads, outright lies confabulations, and cultic belief’s, because these men and boys who do these things only reach out to the media AFTER the fact of intensive activity directed at them in the community.And none of their outreach is polished, very few leave “manifesto’s” per se, and most were demonstrably bullied in the weeks/years/decades leading up to their rampages.
And, these false narratives hinge on journalists suspending their training in journalism ethics, and other Americans never discussing the big, fat, huge elephant in the room behind many mass shootings: a domestic spying apparatus the likes of which the world has never seen before, and that which is run out of Fusion Centers, utilizing the bizarre, unconstitutional and extremely opaque methods of “counterintelligence led predictive policing” which was designed by the CIA to fight a foreign war, against so-called “terrorists.”
This anti-journalism, anti-democratic, and anti-constitutional narrative was crafted by these exact agencies, and is being pushed by the FBI. See here for a news article where an FBI guy advises media to not name shooters–which is unprecedented in the history of the US, and evidence of a “religious, cultic un-naming practice” and an influence operation afoot in these agencies.
There are 77 Fusion Centers, and they all go by different names. What does that have to do with mass shooters?
For starters, they are entirely occulted, they all go by different names, and their is no unified mission–their goals shift from one center to the next across states, though they do “share information,” as they target individuals. They are hidden from view, and their purpose and mission seems is unclear to ANYONE who has researched them. Even in “liberal” media, they are described as “pools of ineptitude” and elsewhere in the mainstream press.Work your way out from there.
But biased narratives, occulted practices, and religious crackpots and zealots litter the narrative of mass shooting events. Here is more about the practice of “un-naming” as relates to rabbinical teachings, and that bleedover from Jewish teaching into christian sects and cults. The neocon, Jewish-christian narrative of the war on terror is in fact, a religious war, and a narrative power grab–including “ritual defamation,” as another cult practice. My readers can investogate that topic themselves, search terms “ritual defamation,” and “unnaming of evil.”
And of those who not-coincidentally waged the entire “war on terror” narrative, the number 77 also has religious meaning. Its an “Angel Number,” and whether it is a Jewish or christian, the number is significant. Rabbi Ismael rambles on about “Metatron,” some giant superhero from the Torah, and christian’s of various
lashes stripes shades denominations ramble on about the magic properties of “the 12th perfect number” which is 77.
In fact/ its a true rabbit hole, but feel free to research it yourself–time sucking religious and occulted gibberish, but it gives us a clue about who is behind these narratives.Read about what I noted above and the mystical properties of 77 from one of those typically named religious sites, “Riding the Beast!!!!“
Related Story: “77 minutes” is a film about a mass shooting. However, as the title itself suggests, “77” is a numerlogical cult symbol, and other numbers could have been used Why did they choose that number?
And, we saw how former (fired/canned/let go) FBI Director James Comey was himself involved with the occult. Here, he “occulted” his identity as he Tweeted, using the name “Reinhold Niehbur,” who was a theologian whose cultic goal and practice was to infiltrate culture with religion.
And here, when Comey virtue-signaled to the Anti Defamation League (please, dear G-d forgive me for my sources, but the web has been scrubbed of the original citations!! on the eve of his firing by Trump. The ADL is the US face of the Israeli Mossad, and Comey claimed that he–and his cult infiltrated FBI– was in a love affair of some kind or another. Indeed–the Mossad doesn’t miss a beat when it seeks to blackmail political targets like Comey. About that love affair….lol.
So, despite all of the occult activity in law enforcement and other agencies tasked with “national security” one might ask: “exactly WHAT the F*** is security, if it means our own government, using influence operations, cult beliefs and practices, hidden religious agenda’s, and targeting citizens?
In summary, there is very little by way of evidence that mass shooters seek fame, or notoriety, but masssive evidence that the practice of “unnaming evil,” is actually cover for how these guys social media is scrutinized before and during mass shootings–but is entirely scrubbed from the web AFTER mass shootings, as the FBI et al ask that we as journalists “Dont Name Them,” and worse.
Among mass shooters who explicitly DID NOT seek fame, DeWayne Craddock is perhaps the best example to deflate the false narrative of the fame seeking mass shooter: that guy just wanted people to leave him the f*** alone, according to nearly all sources.
And Myron May stands out as a prime case of a man who was indeed stalked; who was indeed trying to get help; and who explicitly requested help from several police departments across the country BEFORE he shot anyone. He simply wanted the police to investigate who it was that was stalking him. His outreach–like so many others–was carefully “handled” by these exact agents and their community of gang stalkers, who are involved in controlling the narrative of mass shootings to conceal the cult practices discussed above.
….post in progress, check back later