documented cases of gang stalking

Military “stack formations,” Oath Keepers, Jewish-christian extremism in the gang stalking dialectic-and MOLOCH!: the biblical meaning of the number 13/thirteen

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

gang stalking cases study, numerology and gang stalking, gang stalking and psychology, gang stalking and criminology

U.S. prosecutors are monitoring the various western extremist gangs of Jewish-christian domestic terrorists, most of which are comprised of current and former military, police, and intelligence agents.And some of those gangs use numerological signs and signifiers to recruit members, or stalk targets.

Related Story: From Business Insider, “Phrases Only People in the Military Know.”

As we see with headlines like the following, most “gangs” of “stalkers” are comprised of current, and former military trained personnel, with high levels of “intelligence” training; and that these gangs have high numbers of women in them, some 40-60% being female. ROGS Analysis (you can study the rough research here) predicts this exact configuration in all gang stalking cases too, whether its a standard “community policing” type of case, or a real estate related case, a church related stalking, workplace mobbing scenario, or any other form of this domestic terrorism called “gang stalking.” This configuration is the one true constant of ALL gang stalking.

9 Oath Keepers indicted for conspiracy, including 7 members of the tactical “stack” seen entering Capitol in combat gear

“As always, while conducting security operations, we will have some of our men out in ‘grey man’ mode, without identifiable Oath Keepers gear on. For every Oath Keeper you see, there are at least two you don’t see.”

As we sort through this story, we see that six out of nine of those indicted fit the ROGS Analysis framework completely, including this gem, North Carolina resident Laura Steele, 52, a female former SWAT team member who was working in private security before her indictment-and see if you can spot the number 13 in the article, as these intelligence cultists signal each other using non-coincidental numerology .

From CBS:

“Steele sent a five-page document that appeared to be an online application to the Oath Keepers of Florida on January 3, prosecutors said. In the document, she wrote, “I have 13 years of experience in Law Enforcement in North Carolina. I served as a K-9 Officer and a SWAT team member. I currently work Private Armed Security for [company name redacted]. I am a licensed PPS through the North Carolina Private Protective Services.”

I would like to point out that this blog you are reading has been “followed” by people who also use numerology in their online mayhem, cyber stalking, and then, in the offline stalking that frequently follows, as most recently, this person calling me a “pedo” amd “Mason,” while hiding behind a Knights Templar online presence. Beyond the blatant Freudian projection inherent in that commenters diatribe, this is exactly how strange these cases are.

Read that post, and note the update at the bottom of the page, where I screen capped their use of the number 13.

Strange talk about strange electronics is a staple of the gang stalking dialectic, as most “gang stalkers” are current and former military/intel/police and spies

Then, for comparison, the following day, that same person/group used that number AGAIN, as reflected by my statistics, but this time, sending the link to the US:

To the psychologist, journalist, or others interested in this topic, note the following three things so that you can understand why ROGS Analysis of gang stalking is a useful predictive model with which to analyze cases of gang stalking:

  1. this is a scientifically verifiable and falsifiable proof and evidence of gang stalking, seen across cases studies, which I have documented in cases of mass shootings, workplace mobbing, and “freemasonry” related violence, especially in the work place or military settings
  2. the number has multiple functions as a tool of intimidation, or terror in online PSYOPs, it validates the complaint that “people are following me” as well as validates the complaint that “occultists” are involved, as the numerology contains cultic meaning, specific to many occulted orders, and occult “gangs of police/intel/military” personnel
  3. the number 13-as well as 12–have certain, specific meanings to followers of Jewish-christian biblical narratives; and for the fanatics amongst them, even “deeper meaning” beyond bad luck/good luck.

So, from Chabad online, a primer in how the Moses myths and legends utilized “The 12 Spies” story to go surveying “the promised land,” in an early form of Jewish and white supremacist colonization in the middle east.

Then, have a look at the meaning of that number in biblical terms–it primarily means lawlessness, expressed in various ways that victims of gang stalking complain about, but has many other bible-specific meanings too. Here is just one “meaning” that rabid (lawless) Jewish-christians rally around:

The Meaning of Numbers: The Number 13

The number 13 is symbolic of rebellion and lawlessness. Nimrod, the mighty hunter who was ‘before the Lord’ (meaning he tried to take the place of God – Genesis 10:9), was the 13th in Ham’s line (Ham was one of Noah’s three sons who survived the flood). Thirteen represents all the governments created by men, and inspired by Satan, in outright rebellion against the Eternal.

The phrase ‘valley of Hinnom‘ (or variation thereof) occurs in 13 places in Scripture. The valley was the scene of the evil-inspired rites of the pagan god Moloch (or Molech). The practices related to this false deity received some credibility when they were knowingly allowed by King Solomon (1Kings 11:7) in order to please his non-Israelite wives.

One way Molech was appeased and worshipped was through the sacrifice of children who, placed on the red hot arms of the idol, were burned alive. The valley’s tie to fire made for an apt backdrop of the ultimate punishment unrepentant and rebellious sinners will receive in the lake of fire (Revelation 19:20, 20:9 – 10, 14 – 15).

Lastly, note its use in the story of Esther, where we see the propaganda and PSYOPs related value of that number explored in detail, as well as its meaning as “good luck,” as opposed to “bad luck” which is a classic and pivotal point between Jewish historical narrative and christian historical co-option of that narrative.

In fifteen years of studying this topic, I have found it three specific cults comprised of 13 members (and reported them to the proper authorities). I have also found this number linked to the MKULTRA era and US military social engineering, as well as these actual military intelligence cults whose work is now housed at the Brookings Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank and a major contributor to the hidden, nefarious “Establishment” online influence operations.

With that in mind, many targeted individuals complain about being “mind controlled, and that claim has scientific validity here too, because “influence operations are that, by definition. But when we add threats, insults, and intimidation from people like my “followers,” we see that indeed,it is more than just an online buzzword campaign-that in fact, they do other things in meatspace too. In the case above, note that they literally operated from two continents, which is a significant “proof of gang stalking” to some degree.

Related Reading: The gang stalking dialectic online is full of talk about electronic weapons, and GQ magazine covers the curious case of a senior CIA official complaining of a “directed energy weapon,” while he had deployed himself to Moscow. Spies, and others related to military policing ad security industrial complex who have specific knowledge of specialized weapons are central to these discussions online. Most nefarious amongst them are the military contractors who appear in the dialectic advertising their wares, and using bizarre language. Related to this, we see America’s premier financial forecaster and Forbes Magazine how the “spin” about directed energy weapons has taken interesting turns when discussing the “health attacks” on US diplomats and especially CIA agents around the world.

What are the “Five Eyes” of spying, and what is “generational targeting” in the gang stalking dialectic?

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

The Five Eyes, a part of what the NSA calls internally its “global network” have their dirty fingerprints all over the latest spying scandal engulfing New Zealand, writes exiled Kiwi journalist Suzie Dawson.

The media response has predictably walked the safest line – focusing on the egregiousness of the victimisation of the least politically involved targets such as earthquake insurance claimants and child abuse survivors, and honing in on the very bottom rungs of the culpability ladder. They are as yet failing to confront the international and geopolitical foundations that lie under the surface of outsourced state-sponsored spying in New Zealand.

The truth is that the roots of the issue go far deeper than subcontractors like Thompson and Clark. The chain of complicity and collusion leads far beyond the head of any department or agency, including the Head of the State Services Commission. It goes beyond even the Beehive, the New Zealand Parliament and the Office of the Prime Minister.

At its core, this scandal is a reflection of fundamental flaws in the very fabric of intelligence gathering practices in New Zealand, its infrastructure and network – where the collected data flows, whom the collection of that data serves and to which masters our intelligence services ultimately answer.

This was written in 2019, just as major media began to address the “Five Eyes” spy apparatus that targets journalists specifically, and with a vengeance. It is much related to this kind of activity here.

On one hand, a convenient foil is to claim that “the communists” and the “pedophiles” and the “terrorists” are everywhere in order to occlude intelligence agency abuses of our own citizens; but on the other, to cover over genuine abuse of dissenters/activists/atheists/etc. by our own agencies.

So, what is “generational targeting” in this context? Well, Julian Assange is one prominent example, but there are tens of thousands (growing into the millions) more.

I am old enough to recall the pre-internet and how agencies called “data basing individuals” it a conspiracy theory. And look, here we are, with all FVEYs nations outed as doing just that, across time and space, targeting our freedom of association, our opportunities and more, and all of that without due process of law, or civil liberties challenges anywhere of note. Not a theory at all, but definitely a conspiracy

Here is one man’s story, told in main stream media, a story of exactly that, targeting a child, grown into a man.

Pedophiles? Maybe.They tracked and traced a child from pre-puberty into adulthood and further.

Voyeurs? No doubt, by definition.

Perverts of due process and civil liberties. Most definitely. “They” traced, tracked, and data based New Zealand Green Party MP Keith Locke from the early age of 11.

The sordid tale of the phrase “pedophiles in the deep state,” and intelligence agencies. Welcome to the double talking para=language of spooks online in the gang stalking dialectic!

The revelation in 2009 that Green MP Keith Locke had been spied on since age 11 caused an uproar and prompted an inquiry into SIS surveillance. Now, he writes, the SIS has been forced to apologise for calling him ‘a threat’ in internal documents.

 

Journalists are changing the narrative: Targeting Targeted Individuals, by Teri Webster

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

Journalist Teri Webster, a freelancer who writes extensively in Texas news publications, is changing the narrative of organized gang stalking.

You can read her analysis Targeting Targeted Individuals, where we see good coverage of several of the crackpots and the villains in the dialectic specifically Targeted Justice, a christian intelligence cult that routinely shoots itself in the foot (specifically, here is their response to her article, where they further shoot off their toes on this topic), and many of the tropes of organized gangs of stalkers like “sex offender!” as well as her well sourced account of psychologist Michael Nuccitelli, who was targeted by a group of online harassers who tried to destroy his reputation online(they failed).

Here is my letter to Ms. Webster:

Dear Ms. Webster:


I was once an aspiring journalist, and I published what was likely the nations first article on “manufactured terrorism,” long before noted and award winning journalists like Matt Agorist, or Trevor Aaronson, or others picked that beat.


That article was published in the City College News in 2003, just after the alleged terrorist was arrested after offering himself to the FBI as an informant. My article was not flattering to that agency, its known COINTELPRO, or the emerging evidence that their “terrorist” was “manufactured; or friendly to the full blown and literal police state that was being birthed upon us just afterwards.


Shortly thereafter, I was gang stalked in force, and it did not let up until I left America, and allied myself with foreign persons who could help me “watch the watchers,” whereupon the gang stalking stopped, just like turning off a water faucet.
The only “electronic weapons” that I observed, and documented with evidence during that entire time were wiretaps of various kinds (verified with excellent freeware programs like Wireshark, and other tools that “read” our computers “minds”), obvious surveillance which I sometimes photographed, computer implants–yes, computer code embedded in the Intel and other processor chips of our computers.


I photographed some of the people who followed me around, those people who were photographing me. And, I kept still photos from my security cameras as “mystery people” destroyed them outside my residence, on many occasions. I photgraphed them with hidden cameras as they entered my house during a “black bag job.”


And, I sued a specific security company that had harassed me, and put them out of business too, which enabled several other lawsuits against that company, many of which were covered in the news.


When I read your article on gang stalking, I noted that you said “To borrow a line from The X-Files, let’s just say, “I want to believe,”. My goal is not to convince you, but rather, to “believe” that you actually want to believe. I sensed that in your writing.


SO, Ms. Webster if in fact you want to believe, I suggest that you avoid all of the NSA/CIA/etAlphabet agents, retired spooks, and current and former cops who proliferate in the online dialogues and pollute the internet with their crackpot claims, and ask actual targets of the modern and quite bizarre surveillance about their experiences. You will find those targets everywhere in the activist/dissident/Muslim/LGBT/right-left extremist/and whistle blower communities.


You will find that very few if any of us report bizarre experiences, mystery voices, or lizard people, while ALL of us report surveillance abuse, and bizarre harassment of varying degrees by nameable, traceable agents and agencies. In my own case, every person that I traced using simple SOCMINT and other investigative tools-the same tools that any journalist uses every day.


I have read through your various bio’s before I wrote to you, and also note that your journalism falls into the easy-peezy sort of “public interest” categories which are generally quite flattering to civic arena, and I wish that you take note that your reportage on this topic has performed a sort of disservice to real victims, while upholding a partisan narrative that masks bad behavior by these exact civic structural powers.


If you are interested in separating the wheat from the chaff, I suggest you start at “the strange and hard to grasp truth really is in front of your face, not in some distant galaxy far far away, with aliens, brain zappers, and lots of chat endlessly daring you to prove the negative.”


Best Regards-ROGS

www.gangstalkingresearch.wordpress.com

www.researchorganizedgangstalking.org