Nearly 100% of all reports of gang stalking is current and former police, military, firefighters, and their friends, relatives, and associates in the community doing it. And, it needs to stop.
Everton Brown tried for many years to end his “community sponsored gang stalking,” and failing that, he went ballistic, and killed a few noisy neighbors who “liked to sing kaoraoke on Saturday’s” and worked on their house all the time.
Examining the claims that “the gang stalkers will move in next door to you,” and “wage a noise harassment campaign,” in context to a mass shooting: main stream news is now adopting the ROGS Analysis of gang stalking cases, and some are asking “Crazy or a target?“in the case of Everton Brown, whose very public campaign to end his gang stalking ended badly for a few likely gang stalkers: his very noisy neighbors from Peru. Note that I have had a bit of experience with gangs of stalkers from Peru too.
He sued for relief and lost, and lost again on appeal, for failure to show subject matter jurisdiction, or to properly “name and target” his harassers (Infragard, community policing agents, town home association members, et al.)
If you want to sue gang stalkers, you have to start at the local level, like the Pasco county FL cases, and work your way up, not the other way around. And, try not to make your claim sound so crazy that a judge dismisses it–start by using facts, and naming names, and citing evidence like wireless environment captures from free wireless signal and internet monitoring software programs like Wireshark, and inSSIDer, or “Who Is On My Wifi” that show who is on your internet connection, a frequent occurence with gang stalking situations. And, these programs provide court room worthy evidence too.
Then, other things like hidden cameras, or using dash camera footage, and other photographic evidence of your claims help legitimate law enforcement see that your case is not the type of “fake targeted individual” cases that we see so often online, perpetrated by current and former police, military, intelligence agents and their associates in the “community policing” schemes online.
Mr. Brown did the opposite of collecting solid evidence–and his claim in his filing, while getting at the heart of America’s obscure secret policing methods and legitimately asking for records under FOIA requests, his filing in fact sounds like the rambling of an uninformed individual—not a crazy or delusional person. And the government even acknowledged that some of what Brown sought to discover did indeed exist, but as in most of these bizarre cases, the evidence “could not be located,” which is another way these agencies hide the ball in these cases. Official source gas lighting. So he is clearly swatting at phantoms in his filing, and the filing mentions that exact word.
Then, Everton Brown called 911 some 120 times over several decades, and claimed that the FBI was stalking and harassing him. The problem though, is that while the FBI is very likely to be involved at some level as we see in each and every case of manufactured terrorism and mass shooters, where the after shooting narrative ALWAYS mentions that the FBI was following these guys, , it is not the sole party invested in these bizarre stalkings by far.
Because what gang stalking is is “parallel colliding investigations,” or “intelligence led predictive policing,” in any number of gang stalking programs that pass for “community policing.” These are designed as neverending harassment of people and they are hard to litigate, because they hide behind the catch me if you can police tactic of “police investigation privileged” information, and other loopholes in constitutional law, created by judges to shield criminal police gangs and their associates that utilize “targeted individual programs” in coordination with occulted communty policing tactics, and “intelligence agency led predictive policing” which is derived dirctly from actual spy agencies and their PSYOP related methodology.
Here’s more about Brown seeking relief through “normal” channels:
In these cases, police work covertly to wage dossier driven whisper campaign about the mental health, or police history of the targeted individual, and as the Pasco County cases demonstrate, they explicitly stated that they try to make your life a living hell, until the target” sues or moves away.” Purely psychopathic policing if ever there was such a thing.
And for my money? I am willing to bet that religious proselytization, and domestic violence, or criminal slanders and smears were behind it too. Stay tuned.
A HUGE portion of online narratives of gang stalking involve the “school to prison pipeline,” an octopus of programs that incentivize states to use kids for profits, until those kids grow up and become prisoners in for profit prisons. All US states derive federal financial incentives to continue these practices, but other interests are indeed using children for cash all along the way, too.
Child exploitation–“its for the children” indeed.
Phrases like that above are a hot button topic, and like all “plastic words,” and phrases, is designed to polarize people’s opinion’s while never exactly defining a problem. What exactly is child exploitation? It depends upon who you ask.
Have a look here, at the case of little Christopher Bowen, reported in the main stream media. He was literally sliced open, and diced in many ways with knives, and abused in other ways that defy logic and law. His mother was his primary abuser, but she operated within a child abuse ring, which is a classic example of how actual for-profit child exploitation flies under the radar, because she did what she did in plain sight of “the authorities,” who were indeed “in on it.”
She derived multiple sources of revenue in the form of state and federal funds to abuse her child, with the full complicity of doctors and others in the medical community as they forced her eight-year-old son to have 13 completely unnecessary surgeries, and indeed, the boy endured a life of actual torture for many years because of it. He will likely suffer his entire life from the literal scars of this horrific abuse.
This is what is spoken of online as “torture”–most legitimate complaints of torture in the gang stalking dialectic use that word to describe: Fusion Center assisted computer and cell phone wiretaps; medically unnecessary surgeries that are performed on kids like Christopher Bowen; drug prescriptions that are forced upon people without their consent, and children taken into the custody of the system.
Related Story: How some Jewish immigrants like the Sackler family created the “opioid crisis” that has claimed well over 400, 000 lives in America alone. And, how they became the world’s premier public relations operatives in the medical mafia, before they plead guilty to federal criminal charges. But will they ever see a day in jail?
These “medical mafia’s” operate in every state across America, they operate with impunity, and states are truly complicit in every aspect, taking kickbacks one way or another. In the OxyContin case above, we see states set to gain either way: on one hand doctors prescribing the drug after having taken kickbacks; and on the other hand, states getting profits after the lawsuit was settled. Like the infamous cigarette settlements, the federal government and the states stepped in and effectively denied individual lawsuits, and co-opted the monetary gains in the “name of the people,” but not in fact, acting on behalf of the individuals harmed. So, the victims and the dead will not be financially compensated.
Many claims online about gang stalking are indeed related to “mental health,” if only because of the insanity of the western medical systems, and the complicity and actual conspiracy of others like that of child protection are all financially incentivized, politicized, and completely broken. They are systems designed to fail the children, but to benefit those who sell drugs, surgeries, and other products.And, at each and every preventable point along the pipeline, many of these kids, like little Christopher, are made mentally ill with “manufactured mental illness.”
Imagine that boys nightmares, as he faces a life where he will realize that his childhood was stolen. and actual memories of abuse were virtually handed to him by the child abuse ring that caused his pain? Well, at least he is not alone, right?
Gang stalking case study: What is “child abduction” and “child abuse rings,” in the gang stalking dialectic? Deb Matheny, Minnesota, Eau Claire Academy, child rape and drugging, and state fraud on the courts in foster care, and the affiliated DVIC
Deb Matheny is a mad mom, and she is all over online as a gang stalking target (search: Deb Matheny and gang stalking and Minnesota), and she does in fact provide many interesting pieces of evidence, and examples including screenshots of her devices as she is under “electronic attacks” from Fusion Center and other hackers. And she provides some evidence of how she has been cyber-stalked and harassed, by named police and others. What makes her case interesting though, is that she looks like a classic ALL CAPS COOCOO, until you dig down into it, and separate her more bizarre and colloquially expressed claims into the necessary interpretation, using ROGS Analysis.
Extra points for the fact that she is in regular contact with the FBI and its “human trafficking” narrators.
I have previously criticized Matheny and her group of similarly situated women who have had interactions with Child Protection Services, or with the many tentacles of state government that prey upon their children. I am not a fan of how they use language–their semantical flourishes and exaggeration do nothing to help people understand the issues, and in fact, make things worse. Examples include:
They are hitting me with electronic weapons! As we have consistently observed in the press and media since 9/11, and especially after Edward Snowdens revealing testimony, federal and state level actors are using an unimaginably huge arsenal of wiretap devices, internet routing schemes, and more types of “electronics” than most citizens know about. Its a huge “Catch Me if You Can” scheme of illegal, political, “investigation privileged” policing
They kidnapped my child! Many online claims of child kidnapping involve state “mafia’s” that work together to actually steal children. The Zappalla crime family, and the state of Pennsylvania was notoriously documented in the Kids for Cash scandal
The aliens have abducted my_____(fill in the blank.) This is a common claim in cases where the state steps in for guardianship of an elder, a child, or a spouse, and farms out the “health care” to sordid lots of contractors
Human trafficking! Child sex slavery! All of this has the ring of truth when we shift our paradigm to one where exploitation takes place in state systems.
Pedophiles!!! Satan!!! A huge portion of thee cases online stem from the Satanic Panic era, where the ultra-conservative factions of the FBI participated in a huge hoax, using carefully crafted media messaging, and infiltration at all levels of court rooms and social services. Here’s more about that from the Daily Beast, and their court room character assassin Kee McFarlane, and other key figures whose lives were destroyed by these sociopaths in government.
Who is your handler? In many narratives online, we see one or another fake TI ask another about a “handler.” In intelligence agency speak, a “handler” is someone who directs the actions of an “asset.” Matheny, and many other “targeted individuals”online are actually in frequent contact with the FBI, aka, they are “informants.” Here is evidence of that:
Strong claims require strong evidence, and like most of the bizarre hyperbolic “conspiracy theories” online, the FBI isn’t exactly doing itself a great service to have these clowns ranting incessantly, using bizarre language. Unless….
Like all FBI and other countering violent extremism programs (CVE) online, for informant led operations, especially in the manufactured terrorism, bizarre is the order of the day, because these operations are based in “psychological operations,” aka military derived PSYOP, whose goal is to literally re-order the perceptions of the individuals they target with these “black operations.”
Do an internet search for the phrase “Eau Claire academy crime” and we begin to see parts of Matheny’s story from another angle; and this story linked, to many other peoples stories. And especially, read through this narrative where we see Satanic Panic era “child sexual abuse” claims too.
So, this case is interesting, and worthy of study for the reasons stated above, not least of which is the hyperbolic language used in her narrative.
Sarah is my 27 year old daughter, who in late 2010, early 2011, I reported as being kidnapped. A Fridley Minnesota police report exists (upon her release) as does a report to the Minneapolis FBI, prior to said release. In fact it was my acknowledgement to her (and them) that I had contacted the FBI that I believe led to the perpetrators releasing her. She was dropped off at the Menards in Fridley MN.
She texted me, sporadically, during this time. At first I believed her, that she sneaked these texts to me in secret, though it was my text to her that I had made a report of kidnapping to the FBI, and my belief that they read those texts that resulted in her release. I even at one point believed her to have colluded with these perps and still do, but believe it to have been fear driven. She did inform me threats to harm her family were made. The circumstances involved were strongly indicative to sex trafficking which upon our reunion, she confirmed to me. She was 23 when this nightmare began. To cut to the chase, I have always had my suspicions of people that were in her life. Older woman (40+), who were from out-state (North Dakota) as well as a random bunch of people I had little knowledge of. A person in common all these older woman had was Jodi L. Oborn Perrizo, also passed away suddenly last winter.
Throughout this blog, you will note that I, the author, am affiliated with, or frequently reference journalists who have won the coveted Pulitzer Prize. To whit, Carl Bernstein, the journalist who exposed President Nixon’s “black operations” has said that historically, the CIA has been quite active at every level of major media, gatekeeping and steering our perceptions. And certainly, by inference, we can extrapolate that many other spooks and agencies are active in this regard too.
But intelligence agencies are not the only major players infiltrating and manipulating willing puppets: let’s meet the psychiatric meta-narrative in gang stalking discourse, by contrasting one reputable journalist with several frauds and liars who work in main stream establishment journalism.
I like to call bullshit when I read it, and have followed this topic for over two decades. SO when the UK’s New Statesman went on record denying gang stalking in 2013, and mocking the claim that gang stalkers will “ruin peoples lives,”I was personally being stalked by named security contractors and others. So, as an early journalism casualty of the post-9/11 surveillance abuses, and as the western Five Eyes partners were being revealed in the press due to efforts of people like me; and just before whistle blower Edward Snowden exposed the deep state and fled to Russia, a “narrative” was being crafted in the press about gang stalking.
That criminals seldom come forward and admit to crimes like stalking and worse should come as a surprise to absolutely no one, except enablers like Beauman, and the criminals themselves. Admitting to being a gang stalker would open up new avenues of investigation and prosecution. We see this in the recent cases of gang stalking that have been revealed in the press–like the eBay gang of stalkers where eBay executives, former police, and their associates were indicted for gang stalking; or the case of Rose McGowan, who was gang stalked across continents by the Israeli spy firm Black Cube-we see why these people do not come forward and admit to what they do.
One of the main tenets of the psychological meta-narrative that is on full display in the state sponsored “official source” narrated media around this topic, is that people who claim they are gang stalked are “delusional” and might feel that people are mocking them. So I want to be on record, mocking those who mock others in this way. To whit, Ned Beauman has written about gang stalking in exactly that mocking tone (and note Mr. Beauman’s own syntax and spelling errors in his piece), :
these bloggers are part of an online community centred on a phenomenon called gang stalking. Gang stalking, according to one website:
.” . is a covert investigation that is opened on an individual. The individual is then placed under overt and covert forms of surveillance. The person is followed around 24/7. Foot patrols and vehicle patrols are used to follow the individual around, as part of the monitoring process . . . The secondary goals seem to be to make the target homeless, jobless, give them a breakdown, and the primary goal seems to be to drive the target to forced suicide.
Gang stalking has been linked with, but doesn’t necessarily involve, remote mind control. No one has ever come forward as a perpetrator. But large numbers of people have come forward as victims.”
Beauman then goes on to repeat all of the bizarre, psychobabbling, unsubstantiated claims that most state-source bloggers and pundits frequently fill the internet with, and claims which few actual targeted individuals ever make themselves. These bizarre narratives act as cover for the actual surveillance state that has been built up around every citizen by Big Tech, working with governments around the world to actually target every individual who uses a communications device or computer online “24-7.”
Like most of the crackpots gang stalking denialists online, Beauman goes on to quote some poorly sourced gibberish as he spins his narrative, but also admits to having an “addiction” to reading gang stalking stories onlie, as if it is fan fiction. Such is the mindset of gang stalking denialists:
Reading about gang stalking online can be dispiriting, because one has the sense that someone such as Tausk really ought to be intervening. But I confess I also find it addictive. For instance, consider one blogger who believes even birds and animals are his enemies:
Birds, pigeons and crows, that can be controlled to fly (screaming) over me, to land in my garden when I walk into my kitchen and look outside, to crash into my kitchen window and car front window while driving. Birds, pigeons, that come sit, walk, on the roof of my house when I am upstairs having sex. Cats walking by like being programmed. Barking of dogs, flying away ducks etc, not by mind control but by beaming these animals with laser beams (directed energy weapons).
To working journalists and especially investigative journalists who cover any stories of merit, its no secret that the CIA/FBI/DHS et alphabet agencies control–or attempts to control–major narratives in nation wide and international media. Carl Bernstein wrote that “The CIA’s use of the American news media has been much more extensive than Agency officials have acknowledged publicly or in closed sessions with members of Congress“
This claim, made in the 1970’s is as true today as it was then, but with even more media outlets to infiltrate and exploit. I myself was “handled” to a former CIA agent many years ago, as I studied the craft of writing for the theater. But I realized then what a farce journalism is if in fact, we all must become de facto agency rats, deceiving the public, rather than maintaining a balance between the public’s interest, and democratic processes.So lets take a look at how Bernstein grappled with the problem stated by Beauman above–that problem of “no gang stalkers have come forwards as a perpetrator.”
Bernstein said “The CIA’s use of the American news media has been much more extensive than Agency officials have acknowledged publicly or in closed sessions with members of Congress. The general outlines of what happened are indisputable; the specifics are harder to come by. CIA sources hint that a particular journalist was trafficking all over Eastern Europe for the Agency; the journalist says no, he just had lunch with the station chief. CIA sources say flatly that a well‑known ABC correspondent worked for the Agency through 1973; they refuse to identify him. A high‑level CIA official with a prodigious memory says that the New York Times provided cover for about ten CIA operatives between 1950 and 1966; he does not know who they were, or who in the newspaper’s management made the arrangements.”
So, Bernstein encountered exactly what any journo will encounter with these cases, that certain lack of credible sources, because in gang stalking, in contrast to international spying, these gangs of stalkers are indeed committing criminal acts, and unlike the CIA, they do not always have plausible deniability. And that is their weakness. Start there, and use these free investigative tools to trace the webs of gang stalkers in your own life, or in a story you are writing.
But do not accept as “credible” articles and the writers who write them, because, sometimes, police who stalk others as if they are “gang members” do in fact come forwards, as we see here below, and the indict the exact same agencies and actual conspiracies that every actual targeted individual indicts too:
The letter, written by a deceased police officer, stated that the New York Police Department and FBI were behind the 1965 killing of the famed Black activist.
The letter released at a news conference on Saturday was attributed to a former undercover NYPD officer named Raymond Wood. His cousin Reggie Wood joined some of Malcolm X’s daughters at the news conference at the site where the Audubon Ballroom once stood to make the letter public.
Raymond Wood’s letter stated that he had been pressured by his NYPD supervisors to lure two members of Malcolm X’s security detail into committing crimes that resulted in their arrest just days before the fatal shooting. Those arrests kept the two men from managing door security at the ballroom and was part of conspiracy between the NYPD and FBI to have Malcolm X killed
