What are the “Five Eyes” of spying, and what is “generational targeting” in the gang stalking dialectic?

The Five Eyes, a part of what the NSA calls internally its “global network” have their dirty fingerprints all over the latest spying scandal engulfing New Zealand, writes exiled Kiwi journalist Suzie Dawson.

The media response has predictably walked the safest line – focusing on the egregiousness of the victimisation of the least politically involved targets such as earthquake insurance claimants and child abuse survivors, and honing in on the very bottom rungs of the culpability ladder. They are as yet failing to confront the international and geopolitical foundations that lie under the surface of outsourced state-sponsored spying in New Zealand.

The truth is that the roots of the issue go far deeper than subcontractors like Thompson and Clark. The chain of complicity and collusion leads far beyond the head of any department or agency, including the Head of the State Services Commission. It goes beyond even the Beehive, the New Zealand Parliament and the Office of the Prime Minister.

At its core, this scandal is a reflection of fundamental flaws in the very fabric of intelligence gathering practices in New Zealand, its infrastructure and network – where the collected data flows, whom the collection of that data serves and to which masters our intelligence services ultimately answer.

This was written in 2019, just as major media began to address the “Five Eyes” spy apparatus that targets journalists specifically, and with a vengeance. It is much related to this kind of activity here.

On one hand, a convenient foil is to claim that “the communists” and the “pedophiles” and the “terrorists” are everywhere in order to occlude intelligence agency abuses of our own citizens; but on the other, to cover over genuine abuse of dissenters/activists/atheists/etc. by our own agencies.

So, what is “generational targeting” in this context? Well, Julian Assange is one prominent example, but there are tens of thousands (growing into the millions) more.

I am old enough to recall the pre-internet and how agencies called “data basing individuals” it a conspiracy theory. And look, here we are, with all FVEYs nations outed as doing just that, across time and space, targeting our freedom of association, our opportunities and more, and all of that without due process of law, or civil liberties challenges anywhere of note. Not a theory at all, but definitely a conspiracy

Here is one man’s story, told in main stream media, a story of exactly that, targeting a child, grown into a man.

Pedophiles? Maybe.They tracked and traced a child from pre-puberty into adulthood and further.

Voyeurs? No doubt, by definition.

Perverts of due process and civil liberties. Most definitely. “They” traced, tracked, and data based New Zealand Green Party MP Keith Locke from the early age of 11.

The sordid tale of the phrase “pedophiles in the deep state,” and intelligence agencies. Welcome to the double talking para=language of spooks online in the gang stalking dialectic!

The revelation in 2009 that Green MP Keith Locke had been spied on since age 11 caused an uproar and prompted an inquiry into SIS surveillance. Now, he writes, the SIS has been forced to apologise for calling him ‘a threat’ in internal documents.


Blaming the Chinese/Russians/bad guy du jour for western democracies rampant surveillance state and security contractor corruption problem: Anne Marie Brady gets gang stalked in New Zealand

The Anne Marie Brady case in New Zealand in 2018 brought a lot of attention to how wealthy, well connected people in western democracies use gang stalking, aka security contractors and others, to target their critics, while gas lighting the public at large and allowing blame to fall on the Chinese.

When gang stalking hits the main stream news, it looks a lot like this:

Suspected sabotage of car belonging to burgled professor and China researcher Anne-Marie Brady

16 Nov, 2018 12:00 AM

 Anne-Marie Brady, professor at the University of Canterbury. Photo / Supplied
Anne Marie Brady, professor at Canterbury University

And, journalists who cover gang stalking cover it like this, from Suzi Dawson:

The Anne-Marie Brady case is the most high profile recent example of politically-motivated targeting in New Zealand. Brady’s claims are precisely in step with, and validate past claims myself and other New Zealanders have been making for years. Our experiences foreshadowed hers as if they were mirror images: vehicular sabotage, thefts of electronic equipment, home invasions, surveillance, harassment and other types of psychological targeting methods employed against us by these agencies and their subcontractors.
Dozens if not hundreds more victims would be found if anyone in the NZ media took the leap into the rabbit hole.
I applaud and am relieved for Brady that she has been able to create a bulwark of public support where many other targets are simply written off as crazy or met with a wall of disbelief and silence.

I got news for ya: it ain’t the Chinese, bro’s and sistah’s, its your own people doing it, and yes, the police, working at the behest of wealthy players are allowing it to happen to you, and indeed are complicit in it.

The history of western intelligence agencies breaking the law, is long and bloody, illegal and paranoid; and gang stalking is just a part of the whole shenanigans. Just a blink of the eye before our current crisis of privacy, we saw the NSA sabotaging Crypto AG in 1995 with all of the “bizarre” activity you might expect.

Fast forward to the lawless post-9/11 era, and western intelligence outfits and billion dollar “security contractors” have become–to paraphrase Viktor Frankl “everything they hate” about their purported enemies, and worse.

And here is what gang stalking looks like, and note the “electronic harassment” involved:

University of Canterbury professor Brady, who gained international profile over the past 18 months for her work exposing China’s influence campaigns – including in New Zealand – was subjected to a series of mysterious break-ins at her home and campus office in February.

These burglaries, apparently targeting electronic media including phones, computers and USB drives, sparked high-level interest with the Prime Minister expressing concern, and the Police began a nine-month – and still ongoing – investigation involving Interpol.

Look: maybe if western “democracies” had any real checks and balances protecting the weak from the powerful, or any shred of democracy protecing the marginalized, the dissident, or the activist from our own people’s religionist mob rule, and against the rampant abuse of those of us who use “words” instead of weapons to maintain democracy–maybe then the CCP’s soft force diplomacy, actual on the ground and very active daily capitalism, and ultimately safe society; and the Russian Oligarchy where Edward Snowden fled after becoming a whistle blower wouldn’t seem so “free” when compared to that western mess.

But clearly, what we are seeing in gang stalking is the western democracies crumbling due to their own lawlessness and mob rule, and established communist countries and policies widely appealing to those at the margins of the tribal-sectarian, anti-democratic crypto-theocracies–the pseudo-democracies of the west.

Feel free to shoot the messenger, but I have caught more than your shrapnel-and caught a few scummy spies, too. But the Chinese are not Ms. Brady’s problem. As Suzi Dawson clearly implicates the willingness of western FVEYs nations to allow their puppeteering oligarchs free reign to terrorize same-nation citizens:

What neither Mrs Brady nor her supporters seem aware of or willing to address, however, is that her work didn’t just shine a huge light on China. It focused directly on the same political network that was implicated in the Dirty Politics scandal of 2014. From Brady’s now-famous research paper:

John Key, Judith Collins, David Wong-Tung – these are very familiar names. Brady seems unable to acknowledge that by exposing many questionable connections between China and New Zealand, she is not just exposing the Chinese.
She is exposing New Zealanders. Very well connected New Zealanders.”

For my part, I remember a time when the Chinese were much loved in the FVEYs nations: remember that time when…

Rigggghhhht. Know your place, Chinaman! The “good people” of the west just love you when you know your place in “their” societies, can I get an Amen!?

Wheeeew. I’m glad that’s not my mess to deal with. But you can write to journalist Suzi Dawson if you are curious to follow this “gang stalking in the main stream news.”

Suzie Dawson Suzi3d.com

PGP: B877 2AD6 ED5F 7AE9 F9A9 644E 8612 93BD 3105 1CCD
Public Key: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x861293BD31051CCD.