targeted individuals

2 Source Watching in the gang stalking dialectic: Mike McPhate, journalist, bio, contact, New York Times, California Sun

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

Many years after the New York Times ran a “hit piece” called “United States of Paranoia” and claimed that all targeted individuals are nutters, the following happened:

Mike McPhate, discredited journalist, and propagandist. Image from San Francisco State University Department of Journalism website

SO, we see the Department of Justice taking these cases seriously on every claim–targeted individuals are indeed a real thing, and the lawsuits are just starting.

What can you say about a guy who is on record denying the claims of people whose cases are taken seriously by the Department of Justice and Congress?

In the least, the guy is a hack–an irresponsible journalist, who does poor research, and at worst, Mike McPhate is an outright liar. His journalism cannot be trusted, and he is a liability to anyone who would hire him.

That said, there have been many mass shootings since McPhate wrote his piece, and while these shooters are the extreme outliers, irresponsible journalism like McPhate’s enables those who gang stalk individuals.He has enabled the practice, that other journalists have sought to bring to the public’s attention.

And, he is only one part of the problem, not the entirety of it as we see this other turd in the UK writing similar stuff around the same time. Indeed gang stalking is political.

McPhate acted on behalf of powerful interests, and he is certainly an arm of those who wage disinformation, and the NYT itself. While targeting retribution at these people like McPhate might seem like justice, the solution to these types is is to simply source them, and name them, and debunk them.

Mike McPhate, and others have directly contributed to the targeting of individuals long before the Tampa Bay Times won the Pulitzer for reporting on targeted individual programs. By writing poorly sourced, irresponsible smears about targeted individuals, and their brash disrespect of actual targeted individuals is noteworthy and cavalier–they are targeting the claims of homeless people who are being displaced by property developers; they target anti-apartheid activists and other dissidents who are under government surveillance; they target the working class poor, the black, and the “othered,” because the vast majority of targeted individuals fall into these categories. Those who target such people are beneath respect in any and every way.

And McPhate and his enablers conduct is noted.

Read More: Journalists must carefully vet their sources , and in gang stalking journalism, there is a tone deafness due to political pressure. Source watching is entirely critical in these cases. Here are a few more names to avoid, ranging from Dr’s Lorraine Sheridan, to David V. James, Christine Sarteschi, Mike Wood, Richard Lighthouse, Targeted Justice, Joe Pierre, M.D., and many others who were able to slip false narratives into MSM outlets, or otherwise masquerade as experts on this topic..

What happens in gang stalking? The game has changed but the players are the same: Meet Jennifer Dohrn, gang stalking victim

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

From Democracy Now, we see the targeting of a person who had committed no crime:

AMY GOODMAN: Just before we go to investigative journalist, David Wise, with Jennifer Dohrn still in our studio, I think there was one last story we wanted to hear from you, and that was a trophy that the burglars got when they broke into your apartment.

JENNIFER DOHRN: Right. Apparently on one of the break-ins, they took a pair of my underwear and put it in a glass case and gave it as a trophy gift to Mark Felt….This was discovered — it was actually leaked to me by someone in the press years later who had gone over my F.O.I.A. files.

Break-ins to her home, targeting bizarre items that have nothing to do with crime, constant surveillance by car and foot patrols, and a raft of other activities that sound bizarre to any onserver are standard in gang stalking cases.

COINTELPRO, which Mark Felt is responsible for really implementing was much wider than we ever have come to really understand.

-Jennifer Dohrn

This probably belongs in my “Hero’s and heroines”file, but I will get to that later. For now, meet Jennifer Dohrn, and read about how an FBI director, Mark Felt, kept a pair of her soiled underwear in a glass case as a trophy. So, when psychologists and others seek to discredit the bizarre tales that that targeted individuals have after these “disruption”campaigns waged by domestic terrorists that work in any of many organizations.

So–are gang stalking stories bizarre? You bet they are.

Keep this story in mind when you listen to those who have been gang stalked at any level: the FBI DIRECTOR STOLE A PAIR OF WOMENS UNDERWEAR,and kept them in a glass case. And it wasn’t the famous cross-dressing J. Edgar Hoover who did that: it was Ämerican Folk Hero” MARK FELT, less famous as the FBI Director, and more famous as “Deep Throat,”the guy who gave Woodward and Bernstein the scoop about Watergate,another “weird”break-in by government agents on President Richard M. Nixon’s watch as criminal in chief.

From Democracy Now, more about weird FBI break-ins, and perhaps the weirdest part is that the agency used former FBI agents to do the illegal activity, exactly as ROGS Analysis predicts:

JUAN GONZALEZ: It became clear, I guess in the early 1980s, the extent of this — of the illegal break-ins and illegal activities. Wesley Swearingen, a former F.B.I. agent, actually testified that he had conducted — he was basically a full-time burglar for many years.

JENNIFER DOHRN: Like 238, or at least, he recorded.

JUAN GONZALEZ: At least 238 burglaries in Chicago and Los Angeles, and that New York there was a special squad of the F.B.I., Squad 47

Do gang stalking programs target children? You bet they do.

JENNIFER DOHRN: I lived in New York primarily. I was based in New York. I was very, very active in the anti-war movement and in support of the Black Freedom Movement and the Puerto Rican liberation struggle, and I was followed night and day by the F.B.I. I had my apartments, several apartments, wiretapped. Apartments next to me were rented by F.B.I. agents who kept continuous 24-hour surveillance of every sound made in my apartment. I was followed up and down the streets. I would get a job, the F.B.I. would go in after me, and I would then be fired from the job. It was around-the-clock harassment.

AMY GOODMAN: Were you aware of it at the time?

JENNIFER DOHRN: I was aware of a lot of it. I was certainly aware of being followed a lot. I was —- assumed that perhaps my phones were tapped, and I had no idea of the level of extent under which I was being surveilled. I had no idea that break-ins were repeatedly happening into my apartments. I remember when I was pregnant with my first born feeling extremely vulnerable because I was being followed a great deal of the time, and then it was revealed when I received my Freedom of Information Act papers, over 200,000 documents, that there actually had been developed by Felt a plan to kidnap my son after I birthed in hopes of getting my sister to surrender. So, my imagination -—

AMY GOODMAN: The F.B.I. plans?

JENNIFER DOHRN: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: To kidnap your son?

JENNIFER DOHRN: Yes.

At the level of “counterintelligence”gang stalking, apparently anything goes. SO, America is not now, nor it ever will be again an actual Democracy. It is in fact a police and intelligence state by definition, which is why I write things like this, about diaper peelers, which is a real thing with these insane people.

Gang Stalking Lawsuits: When the USA Today covers “targeted individual programs” its time to reassess your own position about “organized gang stalking.”

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

News articles about organized gang stalking, lawsuits and “targeted individual programs” are gaining steam in the mainstream press, four years after I waged a one person public relations blitz against this form of “intelligence led predictive policing” which is really just junk science, and orthodox biased reporting combined with equally biased data.

Unlike the stories you will find using ROGS Analysis, main stream media is partisan, and biased, and always defaults to “official sources” in the narrative. Yet recently, even the USA Today covered “targeted individual programs,” and called them by their proper name, and even cited the movie “The Minority Report,” as many gang stalking targets have discussed online too. .

Unfortunately, the “official sources” in the gang stalking discourse are all police, forensic investigators, and pro-police psychologists who encouraged the racial profiling and rampant surveillance abuses of the last two decades. You can view these scurrilous persons here, most notoriously the internet famous “anonymous poll” created by Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, whose negligent commentary on that issue has unarguably led to homicides and suicides of targeted individuals.

The Pasco sheriff’s office, in its lengthier statement, said the program is modeled after one adopted in the United Kingdom in the 1990s and that the idea is not to target anyone for harassment.

“It is the goal of the Pasco Sheriff’s Office to have a positive impact on these individuals and our community,” the statement says.

The sheriff’s statement specifically mentions the 2002 film “Minority Report,” which starred Tom Cruise as chief of a “precrime” police bureau that arrests people before any crime is committed based on information provided by psychics.

The program, the sheriff’s office says in part, is not “in any way, shape or form the ideals or implementations projected in the film ‘Minority Report.'”

A central piece of that movie is the idea that some of the psychics disagree with the majority on whether a specific person will become a criminal.

Other jurisdictions have tackled similar issues. The Los Angeles Police Department, for example, last year scrapped for financial reasons a controversial program called “Pred-Pol” that sought to predict where property crimes would occur. Critics said it focused disproportionately on Black and Hispanic communities.

The Florida lawsuit contends the Pasco program violates constitutional amendments that protect rights of association and due process, and against unreasonable searches and seizures

So, when even the most pasty white piece of pabulum journalism on the planet earth–the USA Today— calls a targeted individual program a “targeted individual program,” you can bet that more is to come. Stay tuned.

What is a “targeted individual program,” and where is the proof it exists? There are many, and they go by different names. Here is how to “name them”

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

KW: Gang stalking lawsuits, targeted individuals, intelligence led policing, how to sue gang stalkers, Pasco County Sheriff sued , electronic harassment, predictive policing program lawsuit, targeted harassment program

In trying to change the narrative of organized gang stalking, we encounter the usual hurdle of the gatekeeping mechanism, which is a standard issue in all journalism, and media around the world as governments ranging from post-democracy western allies in the FVEYs alliance, to totalitarian, or authoritarian regimes everywhere all scramble to control our perception of world events. It is one cause under which ALL governments are strangely and perversely united.

Pasco’s program seems like it was ripped from the pages of a dystopian sci-fi novel and not a manual on effective police strategies,”

Here below, for example, is a letter I recently wrote to an extremely well known journalist who I have been attempting to encourage to write about gang stalking for many years, and he is indeed a hard sell as it were, and demands high standards of proof.

This journo has written about people who are actually and provably targeted, and uses that exact phrase at times, covering so-called national security cases; and tentatively agrees with me that a “targeted individual program” exists. But he– as I and others find– agree that there is very little by way of proof in these cases, and, what proof there is is hard to access because the western court systems are nearly impossible to access, costly, and anti-democratic.Throw in the well known and well documented problem of CIA control of media pundits and then, the psychobabble of disinformation specialists, and you have an uphill battle to change this narrative. But there is hope, indeed.

Dear (incredibly well known journalist):

Was the Pasco County Sheriff case enough to convince you? It meets your very high standards and other criterion:
-rigid journalistic standards

-solid evidence of an “organized government program”

-named victims-multiplesources/  news sources concurring

-the use of the phrase “targeted individuals”-actual proof of “electronic monitoring” 24/7

-a lawsuit which will reveal further evidence of the use of “electronic” methods to stalk and harass whole families, on discovery

And here is the headline of that story:

Pasco County parents sue sheriff’s office over ‘predictive policing’ program

The lawsuit claims the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office “punishes people for crimes they have not yet committed and may never commit.”

“Pasco’s program seems like it was ripped from the pages of a dystopian sci-fi novel and not a manual on effective police strategies,” Institute for Justice Attorney Ari Bargil said. “This program isn’t just unethical, it’s patently unconstitutional to use a crude computer calculation to target, harass, fine, and even arrest citizens who have done nothing wrong.”

The lawsuit claims that the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office “punishes people for crimes they have not yet committed and may never commit.” 

Harassment claims in the lawsuit include “relentless visits to their homes at all hours of the day,” “unwarranted stops and seizures,” and “repeated citations for petty code violations.”

The program allegedly violates first, fourth, and fourteenth amendment rights, according to the Institute for Justice.

The Pasco County Sheriff’s Office website refers to the program as “The Intelligence-Led Policing Section.” Analysts in the program identify problems in the community and work to “reduce crime, disrupt criminal networks, and prevent future crimes from occurring,” according to the sheriff’s office.

…..follow the links, connect the dots!©

Related links:

https://ij.org/case/pasco-predictive-policing/

Targeted children, Pasco County Florida, gang stalking lawsuits

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

Gang Stalking lawsuits, 2021, 2022, 2023, targeted individuals, targeting children, Intelligence Led Policing philosophy, predictive policing

All over the western world, and in the USA, “predictive policing” is used to target, monitor, stalk, and harass people who have not committed crimes. But predictive policing utilizes CIA derived technology, junk science, and racial profiling disguised as “Intelligence Led Policing” all of it road tested in Silicon Valley spy rings and middle eastern apartheid states.

One former deputy described the directive like this: “Make their lives miserable until they move or sue.”…..and: “Criminal Justice experts “compared the tactics to child abuse, mafia harassment and surveillance that could be expected under an authoritarian regime.

Many people ask: “who are targeted individuals,” and “who targets targeted individuals?” And “What is gang stalking?” And “where are the gang stalking lawsuits?”

Suit Filed Against Pasco Sheriff For Use Of ‘Predictive Policing’: The Institute for Justice said Pasco County’s policing program is “as dystopian as it is unconstitutional.”

The answer is this: all targeting is police, military, and spy agency related, and it has real victims who are called “targets,”, some of whom are now suing police agencies and state institutions. Meet the journalists from the Tampa Bay Times who write about “targeted individuals”:–and the gang stalking lawsuits based in how police target and harass people have only just begun(click this link to follow these cases).

Targeted

By KATHLEEN McGRORY and NEIL BEDI Photos by DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD Times staffSept. 3, 2020

Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco took office in 2011 with a bold plan: to create a cutting-edge intelligence program that could stop crime before it happened.

What he actually built was a system to continuously monitor and harass Pasco County residents, a Tampa Bay Times investigation has found.

First the Sheriff’s Office generates lists of people it considers likely to break the law, based on arrest histories, unspecified intelligence and arbitrary decisions by police analysts.

Then it sends deputies to find and interrogate anyone whose name appears, often without probable cause, a search warrant or evidence of a specific crime.

They swarm homes in the middle of the night, waking families and embarrassing people in front of their neighbors. They write tickets for missing mailbox numbers and overgrown grass, saddling residents with court dates and fines. They come again and again, making arrests for any reason they can.

One former deputy described the directive like this: “Make their lives miserable until they move or sue.”

And this, which defies every core logic of any so-called “democracy” anywhere”

Criminal justice experts said they were stunned by the agency’s practices. They compared the tactics to child abuse, mafia harassment and surveillance that could be expected under an authoritarian regime.

“Morally repugnant,” said Matthew Barge, an expert in police practices and civil rights who oversaw court-ordered agreements to address police misconduct in Cleveland and Baltimore.

“One of the worst manifestations of the intersection of junk science and bad policing — and an absolute absence of common sense and humanity — that I have seen in my career,” said David Kennedy, a renowned criminologist at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, whose research on crime prevention is referenced in Pasco’s policies.

I first encountered gang stalking around the time a poison pen letter was slipped under my newsroom door.

Like all of such casual leafleting slipped under targeted news editors everywhere, it was the notorious spy ring called the Anti Defamation League (ADL) on one hand decrying “hate” and on the other, asking for boilerplate publishing rights at that newspaper. I knew what was soon to follow, because history repeats itself, and I had watched how that organization coopts dissent in examples like the 1993 “ADL SPying Scandal.” Like their compatriots in racist organized religion who were then waging the Satanic Panic, I was well aware that the ADL stages its own types of political hoaxes.

And like most political advertisements, buzzword laden advertisements, and other racist, religious, or sectarian screeds, I filed it in my curiosities cabinet along with Scientology, white power, and other radical and divisive type racist/sexist/religious pamphlets and appeals.

I didn’t publish it, because that would have been vainglorious, or self serving virtue signalling (self-protective is a better phrase, knowing what I now know about those types of organizations, and the ADL specifically.) At the time, I didn’t think much of it, because I frequently got fliers under the door, one of the ways that political groups, event sponsors, advertisers and the like tried to access column inches in the newspaper. But like all advertisements, I knew what that one was, due to its distinct racist and race baiting angle, which is the norm in so-called “liberal” journalism today.

Related Story: Read “The Kings of Garbage,” a story about ADL spying on activists, and the political blackmail, smear campaigns and other fun that followed. Also see “Faking Rights: Why anti-racists detest the Anti Defamation League“

I view things through the lens of Horeshoe Theory, and I find little difference between ADL types and altNazi’s, and in fact, in most cases, their ideologies–and the group-think of their members–cannot be discerned one from the other except for the name of the group attached, because their levels of invective and bias–and yeah, actual hate are one and the same disease. And I treated it like the curiosity that it was, no different than any other racist political screed: I filed it in my curiosity cabinet with other divisive literature.

These types are as much a problem as they are the solution, pushing legislation that puts victims of “hate crimes” and “hate speech” alongside police, who are rightfully derided for their crimes, and abuses.But hey–I still have a copy of that original poison pen advertisement if anyone is interested, so that’s good. And, others are now writing about “targeted individuals,” too. Also good, I think.

Go over there and read that series–its an eye opening journey through the modern American police state, as seen through the eyes of this generations pre-vetted, young ADL sponges which can barely comprehend the enormity of how widespread these databases are, or how many actual targets. But it gives us a clue about how ADL types and their pet Nazi’s in policing use the term “silent genocide” in the gang stalking dialectic as a straw man argument to justify what they are doing to actual victims of these practices.

What is organized gang stalking? The data says it is military, police, and government affiliated activity, and that it is very real.

~ NotRogsAdmn ~ Leave a comment

First and foremost, gang stalking as defined by police, military, and other surveillance state sources, including pro-prosecution psychologists and attorneys is quite different than how ordinary citizens, targeted activists, and western dissidents define gang stalking.

Related Stories: Gang stalking lawsuits are not called “gang stalking lawsuits” because the term gang stalking is used primarily by actual stalkers, nearly 100% are current and retired police, military, and intelligence agency affiliated. So what is the proper name? Look here as the DoJ prosecutes an actual “gang” of “stalkers” aka the eBay Cockroach Cult, and then, look here at how victims of Pasco County FL Sheriffs department stalking and harassment are now suing the sheriff over his gang stalking program of “predictive policing”

As such, it can be inferred that ordinary citizens, and those affiliated with the military industrial complex or security state funded sources define organized gang stalking differently because of a fundamental difference in purpose and perspective.

SO, nearly 100% of those who are provably current and former spies, police, firefighters, and community assets and their relatives who appear online and off as concerned citizens ALWAYS manage to use the bizarre terminology of “electronic weapons” and more gibberish that is associated with gang stalking, whereas actual persons who are targeted BY these people simply discuss their reactions to being followed, harassed, and so on.

As such, we can see that their are in fact, two distinct groups of people online who are involved in the discussion:

1- police, military, and state government affiliated people who yammer on about “electronic weapons, mind reading locusts, and aliens,” and then,

2- others who simply complain about bizarre activity directed at them by the groups above, ranging from what we see in the case of the eBay stalking lawsuit now being prosecuted by the US Department of Justice, to the well known case of Small Town Terrorism by Rick Krlich in Ohio, who was stalked by a small towns inner clique, ranging from firefighters to the police chief, and all of their friends and associates because he bought a house that the fire chief claimed as his own, without evidence.

Then, there are a few types of hybrid outliers that, when taken as a whole, comprise a substantial set of data indicating religious evangelism is also involved in the dialectic. Crackpots like Dr. Stella Immanuel who repeat bizarre claims of demon sex and electronic harassment by the forces of the devil.

This last group is in essence comprised of religious fanatics, and so on who also engage in the “electronic warfare” side of the dialogues, almost always with an evangelizing intention. Here is a link to Snopes.com, debunking Dr. Immanuel and her bizarre claims. UNsurprisingly, these outliers blur with the police/state factions of gibberish and psychobabble spewing crowd, as evidenced by Dr. Immanuels daughter Mima Fondong being cited in a Rotary Club newsletter *.

These various influences can easily be seen and deciphered in the many, many online blogs, videos, podcasts, and other media devoted to this topic online which is produced by current and former employees of the various US and British (and others known as the Five Eyes, FVEYs) intelligence services who comprise the gatekeeping mechanism surrounding this topic, in conjunction with various police and community assets.

Here is Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) whose founders are former NSA operatives; and who have been connected to several mass shooters, most notoriously Myron May and Aaron Alexis (Bing.com search results easily turn up nearly 42,000 results for the search language “freedom from covert harassment myron may” as of 02/04/2021).

Urban Dictionary–an online, democratic dictionary,* has tracked the evolution of the definition for over two decades, and the results indicate this bipolar narrative has taken on the following meanings:

Top definition

gang stalkingGang Stalking is really a covert government or police investigation. It’s similar to Cointelpro or red squads, and it’s being used on a lot of innocent people to ruin them and make them look crazy. Gang Stalking is all about government disinformation, and using civilian spies/snitches to help with stalking and monitoring innocent people.

“Jim was placed under covert investigation by his employer because of his whistle-blowing. Mistakenly he termed it gang stalking, which made him sound crazy.”

by Cointelpro2 May 03, 2007

Urban Dictionary, accessed 2/4/2021

Urban Dictionary online uses a similar process as those who created the Oxford dictionary used, which is to accept definitions from the population at large, and as demonstrated in the brilliant Mel Gibson film “The Professor and the Madman.” As such, Urban Dictionary satisfies the academic requirements and rigor followed by other esteemed dictionaries in the crafting of of defininitions.

Similarly to the phrase gang stalking, the top ranked definition in Urban Dictionarty defines organized stalking as such:

organized stalking

“Organized Stalking is a form of terrorism used against an individual in a malicious attempt to reduce the quality of a persons life so they will: have a nervous break-down, become incarcerated, institutionalized, experience constant mental, emotional, or physical pain, become homeless, and/or
commit suicide. This is done using well-orchestrated accusations, lies, rumors, bogus investigations, setups, framings, intimidation, overt or covert threats, vandalism, thefts, sabotage, torture, humiliation, emotional terror and general harassment. It is a “ganging up” by members of the community who follow an organizer and participate in a systematic “terrorizing” of an individual.”

Urban Dictionary, accessed 2/04/2021

These definitions, submitted by anonymous individuals, and “upvoted” overan extensive period of time, indicate the validity and stability of this perspective over time, as well as satisfy the academic, and legal, court room standard of defining words, phrases and ideas from a layman’s perspective.

*The Rotary Clubs and many other fraternal/sorority organizations are heavily involved in gang stalking, and I have documented that in many ways across many online and offline narratives and sources, including in my own case, where I was gang stalked by identifiable Rotarians, Lions club members, and others who comprise a sort of international syndicate of stalkers, and who were also implicated in the Hong Kong riots of 2014-2020.

After the riots, mainland China sanctioned many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who were integral to causing the so-called “pro-democracy” riots. You can glimpse that here as China sanctions the CIA-backed National Endowment for Democracy (NED) affiliated NGOs, and here is an example of how powerful and interconnected these NGOs are.

The problem with the stance and posture by the NGOs is that they do not stand for actual democracy, but in fact, religious “freedom” which is in fact just religious-mob rule, as we see with the lawlessness of gang stalking. I documented that in real time as I was myself stalked by these various mobs. That work, evidence, and documentation can be seen at https://researchorganizedgangstalking.org