Say His Name!
‘Say his name’: Tribute trends for 5-yr-old boy ‘executed’ in cold blood after infuriating media blackout
Cannon Hinnant dies after being shot by black neighbor: why does media fail to call it like it is? Say their names!
Everton Brown, murdered after “community policing” aka gang stalking.
Say their names!
We see that the narrative of ” mass shooters seek fame,” is not at all a realistic assessment, but rather, academic level complicity with ” deep narratives,” and the massive “war on terror” crisis public relations schemes across various institutions that are WOT beneficiaries.
There is very little truth, and lots of “ritual defamation” in such claims, because the so-called fame shooter only makes comment AFTER being stalked on social media by WOT operatives and others. Then, Big-Tech, in full complicity with the FBI and other agencies, deletes their postings. So in this sense, Big Tech is not only compliant, but complicit, because ALL of these guys are being monitored online at all times.
And we see that most strikingly in cases like Jared Loughner, who shot one of the darlings of gun control Gabriel Gifford’s, who he likely equated (and perhaps correctly) that she was a Stalinist type of gun grabber.
Loughner didn’t seek the limelight per se, but rather, sought to question the WOT propaganda system, and its “grammar” saying ‘What is government if words have no meaning?’ And of course, Psychology Today asked “What Kind of Psychosis” would cause a young man to question the WOTs war on words, and in a piece titled “The Language and Literature of Jared Loughner” the New Yorker correctly noted that his reading lists of favorite books rightly questioned the CIA/other agency affiliated authors that wrote them, including Joseph Heller of “Catch-22” fame, and others.
Loughner correctly stated at one point that the propaganda system in the US-FVEYs alliance was twisting and contorting “the meaning of words such as “terrorist,”
and that:
“The government is implying mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar [sic].”
To any rational person, that is clearly just a young scholar taking on “the narrative” with the limited tools that young scholars have. He wasn’t seeking “fame” but rather, seeking affirmation that the incredibly bizarre, anti-democracy WOT is indeed a war on words themselves, for which ample evidence exists. But to those who secretly hide behind our internet switches-aka gang stalkers–these words contradict their “mission”of chronic surveillance, and indict fre-thinking individuals as “terrorists,” at which point entire teams of internet trolls begin following and harassing internet speakers, online and off.
Further, no one has demonstrated that Loughner is either crazy for doing that, nor was he “seeking fame.” And certainly, Loughner is now locked away, far, far away from the insight of journalists, so that we can never ask him about such things. So, the pattern of “attacking the messenger” repeats in case after case of “fame seeking” mass shooters. Its a complete inversion of a persons narrative.
Related Story: A survivor of the Soviet era Russian Gulag system, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, wrote the most banned book in the history of the World, Two Hundred Years Together, and chronicled the incredibly high percentage of Jews who were responsible for soulless atrocities during that era, saying” … given the overwhelmingly Jewish composition of the top leadership during much of (the revolutionary) period, it is hardly surprising that “anti-Semitism” was deemed a capital offense (in Russia)” Yet he is also on record emphatically denying that it was exclusively a “Jewish conspiracy.”
And this is because history tends to erase the complicity of the various churches, and oligarchs. corporations and private interests–and especially their deviant “NGOs”– that work secretly to further their own agendas. Think of it this way: the Bank of England, the Anglican and the Catholic churches and their members definitely had a stake in destroying the Russian monarchy, because that’s simply what royalty does, as a basic business model.The same goes with mass shootings and gun control in the US today.
It is in the interests of these hidden powers to take away guns today, just as it was under Lenin/Stalin/Hitler, etc.
So, in cases like Robert Louis Dear, an abortion clinic shooter and self-styled “Warrior for the Babies” lived in the boonies, in a camper, with clear sight lines surrounding it. No doubt, he had been gang stalked, and no doubt because his anti-abortion message was intolerable. But he didn’t “seek fame.”
He sought privacy, and the right to first amendment protected speech. But the media narrative–highly informed by actual gangs of stalkers–seeks to “un-name” these men and boys, as we see with Rebbecah Traister at The Cut, seeking to “dehumanize” them. Keep in mind that her salary over there depends upon sticking with “the narrative” too, while managing to slip in a bit of racism in her narrative too–completely un-called for. And, she is a huge “gang stalking denialist,” too part of the DVIC narrative of a falsely correlated link between domestic violence and mass shootings.
Or in the case of DeWayne Craddock, the Virginia Beach shooter, who shot up a dozen gang stalking colleagues one of whom had called him a racial slur several years before his “rampage.” In all media, and narratives, he was a clean living man, who was clearly stalked by someone, or something at work, and at home. You can read the final report from the Virginia Beach P.D. here.
By all and every account, Mr. Craddock simply sought privacy. He wanted to be “left lone.” And, as a black male who worked at the level of city narrative, we see that he never sought the limelight, unless it was for city business.He had no web presence, or social media.And, he had camera’s pointed outside his home, because people were messing with his car.
And case after case of these incidents where the media is sought, it is to get help not for “mental illness,” but rather, to get attention to the fact that these individuals are indeed being spied on, stalked and harassed, as we saw with the recent Baltimore shooting by Everton Brown, who–oddly–had been smeared in the press several years before his event, and smeared because he protested as an individual.
Andrew Engledinger, the Accent Sign shooter in Minneapolis also apparently lived like a mouse, in a little house, before members of the media–a public relations magazine–showed up at his workplace at the direct request of his boss Reuven Rahamim, who was in fact a “media whore,” who constantly sought the limelight, doing anything he could for publicity. The photographers blasted camera’s in Engledingers face, and distributed those images across the world. Engledinger later killed his Israeli boss, while deliberately sparing others–his was a case of a “workplace harasser targeting mass shooter.”
Frequently, in these cases where the agency/academic smear runs in the pres that mass shooters are seeking fame or publicity, it is almost an upside down “Bizarro world” narrative where these murderers not only target those who have targeted them, but also, that whatever their “beliefs” are, bigger corporate interests manage to steal free publicity after these events.
And especially, keep an eye open in ALL mass shooting cases where the numbers 12 and 13 pop up in odd places. In Engledingers case, his parents were under the sway of the mental health industry–and their many, many “12 step” or “12 week” programs–he “cut off contact with his family soon after he learned that his parents enrolled in the National Alliance on Mental Illness’s 12-week Family to Family course,”and so, then begins the mental health smear–that he was “paranoid.”
To sane people, familiar with the western dialectic, its plain that dysfunctional families scapegoat a member, and even more plain that when others seek “help” for you, its usually them who need it most–a well known patttern in the “family mental health” field. to any non-christian what these symbolic numbers mean, and they are recurring themes in “medical mafia” related advertising, especially all of the 12-Step programs that are a hundreds of billions of dollars industry, and the source of a few blogs about that exact topic: AA styled 12 step programs and gang stalking.( the woman who wrote that blog is learning disabled, so click her avatar for the more interesting stuff)
Whether its the “mental health” lobbyists, or the “domestic violence industrial complex,” or some “security company with security products” to sell, we see what a major publicity opportunity the press allows in these cases because in fact, crisis PR agents are managing the entire narrative.
This is clearly the case in the Ten Thousand Oaks shooter Ian Long, we see people who had bullied the guy turning up as “narrators” long after the initial bullying incident–and some calling him “quiet, not a bad guy,” which is frequently repeated in nearly ALL of these cases.
In Long’s case, his former track coach Dominique Colell showed up in interviews, post-mortem, telling a story about how she had stolen his cell phone, and forced him to “run 13 miles.” In that story, she turned it around and said that he had “attempted to rape her” as he grasped for his stolen phone, which she had hidden behind her back. Those 13’s are EVERYWHERE in these cases too. She herself is affiliated with the Lutheran sects and colleges.
Talk about Fame Whores! Indeed, Ms. Colell was a beauty queen pageant poser, and has her own side business as a “Chainsaw Chick.” Female bullies are also high on the narcissism scales, and the associated sociopathy that goes along with that. Female bullies and their enablers are indeed a real thing. So–who exactly hunted her down for such an interview–how did they know to get that “special quote?” Yup….and again, these are some “tough chicks,” and their “partners in crime” too.
Long by contrast, was said to be a loner, who avoided the limelight; and then, among his victims–a stunning amount of undercover or off-duty cops and security personnel too. ROGS Analysis predicts as much, because gangs of stalkers are 100% police and security persons, working in the “community policing” scam. And indeed–there is a war on America’s doors and gates, as we see in the Doorman Wars of Minneapolis.
So: who exactly is seeking the limelight in mass shooting cases? Say THEIR Names!
In the Ten Thousand Oaks shooting, it was clearly Ms. Colell with a special message about sexual harassment, and the number 13, for some reason. And that is a constant in these cases too, as one after another, ranging from the Portapique mass shooting by Gabriel Wortman, to the narrative of the Pulse Nightclub shooter Omar Mateen–the billion dollar domestic violence industry (DVIC) and its nefarious “advocates” can’t get their message into the news quick enough.
So much for the FBI/academic narrative that mass shooters “seek fame,” as most of the time, they just want gang stalking colleagues to leave them alone, and many of them have gone to great lengths to gain privacy, anonymity, and peace. But that’s not what they found, because even in solitude, gang stalkers indeed “will move in next door to you,” and wage harassment campaigns of all kinds. And Fusion Center’s will spy on you too, once your name is handed to them by any of the agencies, or their thousands of “security contractors” across America.
The entire narrative of the “fame seeking mass shooter” is an occult concoction with its roots in the middle east, long before the “war on terror,” and FBI/CIA/DIA influence operations in media and elsewhere–notably those roots are in earlier era Satanic Panic, and counter-terrorism related fake news; and the practice
It stems directly from “unnaming of evil” cultic practices in various Jewish-christian religions, and its practice viw No Notoriety, and other similar groups is directly related to that. Let me demonstrate that the “narrative of notoriety or fame-seeking” and its related topic of ritual unnaming comes from religion, junk science, and far right cultic presence in the US Intelligence counter-terrorism funding chain.
Related: American and other universities research is funded by the CIA and other “deep state” interests. We get a glimpse of the battle for the dialectic on this issue as two academics debate another academic, who is a fraud and a liar. So, Adam Lankford, a professor of criminology at the University of Alabama is one of many who have made these false claims that the US has more mass shooters than any other country, and that study–like so many of those studies, by many professors, ignores root causes, and also deliberatly obscures sources.
Lankford’s work–similar to David V. James and Lorraine Sheridan’s work–is pure poppycock, and his entire academic trails begs us to ask “who exactly is funding this guy’s research?”Regardless, Lohn R. Lott, Jr., from the Crime Prevention Research Center and Carlsile E. Moody from the College of William and Mary took on Lankford’s claims, and dragged a pro-police, dubiously funded cockroach into the open, in a paper from 2020 titled
Brought Into the Open: How the U.S. Compares to Other Countries in the Rate of Public Mass Shooters
“Adam Lankford (2016) asserted that the United States accounted for 31percent of the world’s public mass shooters over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012 “Click that link for insight into how the narrative of the mass shooter is itself a cash cow, bringing research grants to many professors who peddle junk science.
Here is the previous paper from Lankford that Lott and Moody were replying to “Confirmation That the United States Has Six Times Its Global Share of Public Mass Shooters, Courtesy of Lott and Moody’s Data” smugly gloating that he is right “nah, nah nah, nah booboo.”Conformation bias indeed.
The FBI-academic paper factory that continuously cranks out such junk science hinges on thin threads, outright lies confabulations, and cultic belief’s, because these men and boys who do these things only reach out to the media AFTER the fact of intensive activity directed at them in the community.And none of their outreach is polished, very few leave “manifesto’s” per se, and most were demonstrably bullied in the weeks/years/decades leading up to their rampages.
And, these false narratives hinge on journalists suspending their training in journalism ethics, and other Americans never discussing the big, fat, huge elephant in the room behind many mass shootings: a domestic spying apparatus the likes of which the world has never seen before, and that which is run out of Fusion Centers, utilizing the bizarre, unconstitutional and extremely opaque methods of “counterintelligence led predictive policing” which was designed by the CIA to fight a foreign war, against so-called “terrorists.”
This anti-journalism, anti-democratic, and anti-constitutional narrative was crafted by these exact agencies, and is being pushed by the FBI. See here for a news article where an FBI guy advises media to not name shooters–which is unprecedented in the history of the US, and evidence of a “religious, cultic un-naming practice” and an influence operation afoot in these agencies.
There are 77 Fusion Centers, and they all go by different names. What does that have to do with mass shooters?
For starters, they are entirely occulted, they all go by different names, and their is no unified mission–their goals shift from one center to the next across states, though they do “share information,” as they target individuals. They are hidden from view, and their purpose and mission seems is unclear to ANYONE who has researched them. Even in “liberal” media, they are described as “pools of ineptitude” and elsewhere in the mainstream press.Work your way out from there.
But biased narratives, occulted practices, and religious crackpots and zealots litter the narrative of mass shooting events. Here is more about the practice of “un-naming” as relates to rabbinical teachings, and that bleedover from Jewish teaching into christian sects and cults. The neocon, Jewish-christian narrative of the war on terror is in fact, a religious war, and a narrative power grab–including “ritual defamation,” as another cult practice. My readers can investogate that topic themselves, search terms “ritual defamation,” and “unnaming of evil.”
And of those who not-coincidentally waged the entire “war on terror” narrative, the number 77 also has religious meaning. Its an “Angel Number,” and whether it is a Jewish or christian, the number is significant. Rabbi Ismael rambles on about “Metatron,” some giant superhero from the Torah, and christian’s of various lashes stripes shades denominations ramble on about the magic properties of “the 12th perfect number” which is 77.
In fact/ its a true rabbit hole, but feel free to research it yourself–time sucking religious and occulted gibberish, but it gives us a clue about who is behind these narratives.Read about what I noted above and the mystical properties of 77 from one of those typically named religious sites, “Riding the Beast!!!!“
Related Story: “77 minutes” is a film about a mass shooting. However, as the title itself suggests, “77” is a numerlogical cult symbol, and other numbers could have been used Why did they choose that number?
And, we saw how former (fired/canned/let go) FBI Director James Comey was himself involved with the occult. Here, he “occulted” his identity as he Tweeted, using the name “Reinhold Niehbur,” who was a theologian whose cultic goal and practice was to infiltrate culture with religion.
And here, when Comey virtue-signaled to the Anti Defamation League (please, dear G-d forgive me for my sources, but the web has been scrubbed of the original citations!! on the eve of his firing by Trump. The ADL is the US face of the Israeli Mossad, and Comey claimed that he–and his cult infiltrated FBI– was in a love affair of some kind or another. Indeed–the Mossad doesn’t miss a beat when it seeks to blackmail political targets like Comey. About that love affair….lol.
So, despite all of the occult activity in law enforcement and other agencies tasked with “national security” one might ask: “exactly WHAT the F*** is security, if it means our own government, using influence operations, cult beliefs and practices, hidden religious agenda’s, and targeting citizens?
In summary, there is very little by way of evidence that mass shooters seek fame, or notoriety, but masssive evidence that the practice of “unnaming evil,” is actually cover for how these guys social media is scrutinized before and during mass shootings–but is entirely scrubbed from the web AFTER mass shootings, as the FBI et al ask that we as journalists “Dont Name Them,” and worse.
Among mass shooters who explicitly DID NOT seek fame, DeWayne Craddock is perhaps the best example to deflate the false narrative of the fame seeking mass shooter: that guy just wanted people to leave him the f*** alone, according to nearly all sources.
And Myron May stands out as a prime case of a man who was indeed stalked; who was indeed trying to get help; and who explicitly requested help from several police departments across the country BEFORE he shot anyone. He simply wanted the police to investigate who it was that was stalking him. His outreach–like so many others–was carefully “handled” by these exact agents and their community of gang stalkers, who are involved in controlling the narrative of mass shootings to conceal the cult practices discussed above.
….post in progress, check back later
If I had one day to live again, I would start it at Schweda’s, just off of the lake.
But people like you (that one reader, and you know who you are and so do i)–who will find painful endings to your lives–stopped that memory before it formed.
See you in Valhalla, or–under a speedboat, with my arms around your neck, as a propeller grinds–such as accidents happen, right?
And of course, Sebastian–feel free to ask questions!
Everton Brown, one of the most recent mass shooters, wasn’t seeking fame–he was seeking an end to what he perceived as “gang stalking,” that had a real estate conflict at its center. He thought the FBI was harassing him, sued for information, and was rejected in his claims, when in fact it could have been any number of organizations and especially “community policing” elements of his local jurisdiction.
Related: The Cult of Intelligence: Fame seeking mass shooters are nearly a complete fabrication–the furhtest outliers in a handful of extreme outliers on the Bell Curve of mass shootings.Yet the strange science behind false claims that mass shooters “seek notoriety/fame” are easily debunked, and many acadmic’s who profit from writing such provably false claims are also participating in religious, cultic activity as demonstrated in the linked post.
Brown specifically indicted “the FBI, the military, and the community,” as stalkers, and indeed, in many cases we see that narrative validated, especially with black men. We saw that exact group of stalkers, plus the ADL, stalking Dr. Martin Luther King. I mean–the US Army Intelligence stalked the entire King family for over four generations, according to court testimony, and other sources.
The same is true of the Malcolm X family, too.
SO, while Mr. Brown’s claim that the FBI was stalking him is “likely true,” he did not have evidence, nor did he try to get any, because he was doing what many “lay persons” do when they are under threats that are complex, and hard to investigate: he blamed those who he had been indoctrinated to blame, the FBI. So, his claim was merely a naming error, but stands on the latter part of its face: he was indeed being “framed” as a crazy person for PROTESTING. And, he was framed by political operatives in the press, too
So, the pattern repeats: DeWayne Craddock was definitely NOT seeking fame–he was seeking two things: one, to be left-the -f*** alone, and two, he tried to document who it was that was messing with his car, and later, on his shooting spree at work that targeted specific people, we saw “survivors” discussing how his workplace was full of “pranksters” who coincidentally used Masonic symbolism in their “pranking” (search Dewayne Craddock masonic pranks).
He was also framed by some members of that gang as “violent” which is a claim that is open to factual interpretation of “who did what first, and to whom” but that is never a question when individuals are targeted with “high policing” that frames them as the “bad guy” long before any ballistics start popping. Like other bullshit profiles emanating from the last generations “empowered” white women’s FBI–among them one of my favorite’s “The Profile of the Mental Rapist“–its all junk science and ritualized defamation, no different than early COINTELPRO era stuff, but with more “diverse” faces attached. .
And, we see one or another bullshit FBI profile blast out in the press too after these events. In Craddocks case, he was, according to the FBI a “fixated shooter,” much like their other bogus profile of the comically named “hurt collector,” and other such junk science, which acts as cover for their organizations cultic, deep state operatives using “ritual defamation” as they target people. And as usual, keep your eyes out for the magic numbers 12 and 13 in these stories, as these shooters often target those who targeted them with psychobabble about “bad luck.” Craddock shot 12 people.
Andrew Engledinger, who went on a workplace mass shooting, was not by ANY accounts in media or otherwise, seeking fame. In fact, he lived by himself, like a mouse in a small house, until one day, a public relations company showed up at his workplace and blasted camera’s in his face, splashing him all over their “PR blasts as an employee of Accent Signage in Minneapolis. One must ask: who was seeking to “frame” Mr. Engledinger as a fame seeker indeed.
Later, media ran stories about his Israeli-intelligence agency affilliated boss, and noted that Reuven Rahamim did indeed SEEK SHITLOADS OF FAME, which Engledinger provided eventually. In fact, Rahamim was, like, a media whore, seeking fame constantly for his products, which “helped the disabled.” What a laugh. Google His Name! and see how often that guy SOUGHT NOTORIETY. But Engledinger? Not on record ANYWHERE, EVER seeking fame.
Cases like that sort of turns that ultra-orthodox-Mossad-FBI-zionazi-policing narrative of terrorism on its head, huh? Here is a “timeline” of events(.pdf) from the local news station KSTP, Tell me if you can spot a place on that timeline where Engledinger “seeks notoriety,” ok, kids?
And who could discuss mass shootings without mentioning the Molson Coors Milwaukee shooting, where a black man had a noose hung on his locker, long before he went “ballistic,” and shot up a few of his stalkers.
Clearly, few of these men are seeking notoriety–and yet, Molson Coors for example got tens of millions of dollars of “free advertising” after the fact, because in public relations campaigns “free placement”is EVERYTHING to corporations that use gang stalking to gain free placements online.
Well, as we see time and time again, people like Tom Teves and his occulted, FBI affiliated “brand agents” are total liars–totally full of shit. Mass shooters largely just seek to be left alone, in case after case after case.
When I first encountered the “No Notoriety” and ” Don’t Name Them” movements online, whose claim is that mass shooters seek “fame” in order to “inspire” or create “contagion effects,” I thought, gee, it is antithetical to democratic discourse to disguise, obscure, or deny insight into ” facts” in “democratic” media–directly against the very core of reporting, which asks the reporter to identify the sacred 6″Ws” of journalism when telling a story:
Who. What. When. Where. Why. And because journalists humor is often quite dry, we are instructed in J-school to include the word How, in “the Six W’s of Journalism,” probably just to confuse our editors. BUt anyone who is tasked with telling a story–such as PR persons and SEO marketers– and all investigators also use this method, though the name may differ.
My clever readers might have noticed that “Who” is the most important detail in that lineup–the very first question that gets asked or answered. So, I thought “what malignant bad actors, democratic posers, or fascist/Stalinist elements are behind such a dialogue?” And “how could any American believe that hiding facts from the public be in the interests of democratic discourse?” Much less the very first, most important detail of ANY and EVERY narrative.
I posited that maybe it was some interest group or political PAC type of public relations scumbag, targeting easy targets like the sad and angry parents of children who had died in mass shootings, and them, putting them under the sway of some evil public relations firm for easy clickbait or something. But who could have such a huge budget for that kind of “influence operation”–what kind of soulless, sociopathic, anti-democratic monsters would target the parents of dead children with an “influence operation?”
I began to hatch an admittedly cockamamie “theory” that it was far right religious fanatics, or maybe “the Russian’s” or “the Chinese”–even possibly “ISIS” or “ISIL” or any of those ever changing evil geniuses in the middle east who were seeking to undermine American freedom and democracy, by influencing journalists to forego their training in ethics, and reportage in the public interests to obscure important “facts,” like the names of mass shooters!
Then, I thought “maybe it’s just some mad scientists, and others whose claims were based on biased data, and junk science,” who were trying to make a name for themselves in academia by writing papers filled with bad evidence, and false claims, maybe because they needed attention, or some grant money or something; and then I decided to research the topic in earnest. I began my hypotheses thus:
Research questions:
These three questions above guide my work below, which is just beginning. But I am happy to report that of the most surprising findings, answering the question “what kind of anti-democratic, shady operators….” the answer can be found in this story below about a guy from the FBI, working an “influence operation” aka a “mind control” PSYOP, on a few rubes in the American Southwest in 2014:
Well, there you go for an answer to the question “what kind of shady, anti-democratic, fascist/Stalinist, scumbag,”, etc. would try to erase the most important detail of all journalism, ever, in stories about mass shootings. I mean–if you have nothing to hide, right guys?
But that wasn’t how the official story began by a long shot. No–that story arguably began much earlier, and in other era’s–a topic too big for this blog post.
Arguably, we see the beginnings of it in the school shootings of Kip Kinkle–who has remained silent, and definitely HAS NOT sought notoriety of any kind until recently, where he made a full apology for his heinous crime. THe narrative then was that he was insane.
And we see this theatrical influence operation aspect emerge in the case of the Columbine massacre–that same Columbine event where the son of an FBI agent* participated in filming a mock-up of the shooting itself, a year or two before the actual shooting happened; and that exact FBI agent participating in that exact investigation, much as we see with the curious positioning of the Manfredonia crime dynasty to the Newtown Ct, “Sandy Hook” shooting too.In the latter case, Manfredonia family members were present at the crime scene, and later, one of their own became a mass killer too.
Then, if anything began to be conatgious, aka “create social contagion and copycat” events, it was this exact fraudulent narrative. Let’s take a look at one analyses of the junk science that is used to cover the tracks of these dirty gang stalkers in various US military/intelligence/policing web of “mass shooting creators;” as the following study notes:
34 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2018
Crime Prevention Research Center
Date Written: August 25, 2018
A paper on mass public shootings by Adam Lankford (2016) has received massive national and international media attention, getting coverage in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, plus hundreds of other news outlets spanning at least 35 different countries. Lankford’s claim was that over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012, an enormous amount of the world’s mass public shooters — 31% — occurred in the United States. Lankford attributed this to America’s gun ownership.
Lankford claims to have “complete” data on such shooters in 171 countries. However, because he has neither identified the cases nor their location nor even a complete description on how he put the cases together, it is impossible to replicate his findings.
It is particularly important that Lankford share his data because of the extreme difficulty in finding mass shooting cases in remote parts of the world going back to 1966. Lack of media coverage could easily lead to under-counting of foreign mass shootings, which would falsely lead to the conclusion that the U.S. has such a large share.
Lankford’s study reported that from 1966 to 2012, there were 90 public mass shooters in the United States and 202 in the rest of world. We find that Lankford’s data represent a gross undercount of foreign attacks. Our list contains 1,448 attacks and at least 3,081 shooters outside the United States over just the last 15 years of the period that Lankford examined. We find at least fifteen times more mass public shooters than Lankford in less than a third the number of years.
Even when we use coding choices that are most charitable to Lankford, his 31 percent estimate of the US’s share of world mass public shooters is cut by over 95 percent. By our count, the US makes up less than 1.43% of the mass public shooters, 2.11% of their murders, and 2.88% of their attacks. All these are much less than the US’s 4.6% share of the world population. Attacks in the US are not only less frequent than in other countries, they are also much less deadly on average.
Given the massive U.S. and international media attention Lankford’s work has received, and given the considerable impact his research has had on the debate, it is critical that this issue be resolved. His unwillingness to provide even the most basic information to other researchers raises real concerns about Lankford’s motives.
Keywords: mass public shootings, cross-country data, mass murder, terrorism,
JEL Classification: K14
Suggested Citation: Lott, John R., How a Botched Study Fooled the World About the U.S. Share of Mass Public Shootings: U.S. Rate is Lower than Global Average (August 25, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3238736 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3238736
When I realized that it was the FBI creating the false narrative, all bets were off that America is anything other than a secret police state, ruled by an opaque group of religious zealots who work from within intellegence and security apparatus.
Then I looked a little deeper, and guess what?
Yup: some people in America truly do want to have an eastern block styled press, rather than a free press. So SAY THEIR NAMES! And follow the leads where they take you, which WILL BE directly to these agencies, who are indeed part of an actual “plot,” as they say in any writing class.
….post in progress, check back later
Officials are quiet about the murder of former state Rep. Ashley Henley and sheriff Mark D. Fulco isn’t helping a bit, In fact he may be “obstructing.”I mean–just look at the guy, right?
Ashley Henley, 40, a former state representative from DeSoto County, was shot and killed June 13. Yalobusha County deputy sheriffs found her body around 10 p.m. outside a Patricia Drive address in the Water Valley Boat Landing area on the south side of Enid Lake.
According to reports, the Yalobusha County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the death, with the assistance of the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation and the District 17 District Attorney’s office. Sheriff Mark D. Fulco has not responded to a request for information from the Daily Journal.
And the murder six months earlier at the same location is also curious, as her sister-in-law Kristina Michelle Jones toxicology report showed no smoke in her airway, indicating the fact that her body was placed in a burning trailer rather than that she died in a fire.
But what makes this a “state-sponsored”gang stalking event is this, below from Dan Abrams Law and Crime blog:
The Henleys believed Jones died as the result of foul play and have been critical of Yalobusha County authorities, especially Fulco and coroner Ronnie Stark. After months of remaining silent, both Brandon and Ashley Henley took to Facebook in April.
“My sister was murdered and her body was burned. We know she was dead before the fire and that the fire was arson,” Brandon Henley wrote in an April 6 post. “And we didn’t find out any of that information from the Sheriff’s department.”
The same day, Ashley Henley wrote on her Facebook page that two deputies tried to intimidate them while they were attaching flowers to a makeshift memorial erected on the Patricia Drive property, which is privately owned by the Henley family. The memorial is a 4-by-8-foot sheet of plywood featuring pictures of Jones with the words “I WAS MURDERED” in nearly one-foot-tall letters.
IN the majority of police gang stalking events in the news, we see police disarming citizens before they are murdered, or meet other fates.
-undermining lawsuits against the police that seek to discover evidence of gang stalking
-trying to take away guns before they murder you, as we see in this case
-they try to say that the target is “crazy” as we see repeatedly when gray area policing, aka gang stalking takes place and in the recent Publix shooting too
“We demand answers. We will not be intimidated. We are not going away. We will not back down. We will not be silent any longer,” Ashley Henley wrote on April 6.
As I mention repeatedly, I get trolls, most of whom operate from within the framework of ” current and former intelligence agents, police, military, and their related factions.” In other words, I am PLAGUED by spooks.
That said, a hearty ROGS welcome to “radiated247″ who seems to have a ” well you know, I was indoctrinated by CIA funded National Endowment for Democracy” spies problem.
Yeah–my heart goes out to you, lol. (Not really.)
Lets take a look at how the “democratic dialogues” have been co opted and stolen, and manipulated by highly placed USA/ FVEYs government officials, and then, we can talk later, ok?
You, there reading your own post, are named ” radiated247″ right? And your entire web presence aside from your useless garbage language strewn blog is this here, right? Yeah, I thought so. To any Occidental, or Oriental observer, you look like a moron. A complete amateur, doing “whatever it is” that you are doing, ok?
So, please “do this.”
SO, that in mind, let me tell you: Hong Kong–whether you like it or not, belongs to the Chinese Mainland National Governemt. ANd before you start on about how Britain made some kind of deal or other, and guaranteed some kind of “freedom” or other–keep in mind that the British were forcing people to become drug addicts, and manipulating their lives, long before 33 Jews showed up in Shanghai, and financed Mao.
Really–Hong Kongs strange version of ” free speech” begins and ends with ” are international NGOs affilliated with organized religions, and western occult societies (Freemasons, Opus Dei, CFR, Rothschilds,etc?)” and “foreign state powers?”
Um…yeah. And, maybe, get some solar blocking window film to keep light out of your apartment there in the eastern district of HK. And/or realize that the hey day of NED operations is long gone in Hong Kong.
From the Mississippi Free Press:
,Former Rep. Ashley Henley ‘Murdered’ By Gunshot Outside Trailer Where Sister-In-Law Died, Officials Say https://www.mississippifreepress.org/12964/former-rep-ashley-henley-murdered-by-gunshot-outside-trailer-where-sister-in-law-died-officials-say/
Authorities are investigating the murder of former Mississippi House Rep. Ashley Henley, seen here with husband Brandon Henley in 2019. Her body was found outside the remains of a trailer where her sister-in-law was found dead after a December fire. Photo credit: Ashley Henley/Facebook
Northern Mississippi is a hotbed of incestuous political ties, and “state-crime” syndicates, as we see in the case of Richard Moore, who runs the North Mississippi Anti-Gang Stalking Facebook, and his lawsuit against corrupt “high policing” which is gang activity at the state level.
And, Rep. Henley was gunned down shortly after police in that area had tried to take her lawfully owned and registered firearms.
sheriff’s deputies had “attempted to intimidate” and “threatened to arrest” her for carrying a concealed firearm when she visited the home to leave flowers at a memorial that she and Brandon had built.
“I know the law, and I also know how quick people disappear down here,” Henley said in a subsequent comment to the April 6 post. “I’ve known Michelle since she was 9 years old. She was truly like my little sister. I will not give up on her. We will find out who did this, with or without help from Yalobusha County. She’s not the first to die like this down there, but I’m going to do everything in my power to make sure she’s the last. Her death will not be in vain.”
On May 24, Henley posted what appeared to be a photo of a certificate listing the cause of Jones’ death as “unknown” and the manner of death “undetermined.”
“ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE,” Henley said in the post. “To those Granted #PublicTrust and Responsibility for Ensuring #Justice For All – You may think this is over and your job is done, but you are mistaken. This is only the beginning. I will leave no stone unturned in my pursuit of truth.”
From WREG:
Hey, lady!
Sheriff Banal T. Banksterbux from Palm Beach Florida wants YOU to know that the recent Publix shooting was YOUR FAULT! Gang Stalk Harder!©
The Publix Shooting was a DVIC related shooting, a real estate related shooting, and a gang stalking event. Watch as the sheriff (that counties Chief Revenuer©–tries to blame the ex-wife of the shooter for not “gang stalking” hard enough, and trying to help him and his henchmen to frame the guy as “schizophrenic,” in “need” of even more “state and county services”–the EXACT same state and county services that had driven the guy into bankruptcy.
Hey, Sheriff–it seems Hey, Sheriff–it seems And a few questions for you: have you heard about the first amendment? It guarantees the right to free speech, as long as there is not an “imminent threat,” which there wasn’t. unless you count how you and thers monitor peoples social media as a way to harass and control what they say. that the gang stalking program in your county drives people a bit crazy. oAnd a few questions for you: have you heard about the first amendment? It guarantees the right to free speech, as long as there is not an “imminent threat,” which there wasn’t. unless you count how you and others monitor peoples social media as a way to harass and control what they say.
Ex-Wife Of Publix Shooter Timothy Wall Frustrated With PBSO Sheriff
Monica Wall’s statement, after Sheriff Banxsterbux accused her of not gang stalking hard enough: the statement takes exception with the sheriff’s comments, blaming her for not gang stalking hard enough, reading,
“Without knowledge of all the facts, the Sheriff specifically mentioned Mr. Wall’s Ex-Wife in a press conference and insinuated that she and her family should have done more to prevent this tragedy.”
Tim Wall, the Publix shooter in Palm Beach FL, lost everything he had to the divorce courts, and their octopus of “fees, services, assessments, lawyers, social workers, psychologists, and judges” and later he declared bankruptcy. But not before he gave his house away to his ex-wife. And even then, he still had to pay the mortgage for the house she lived in! Imagine that!
‘Merica so bizarrely “gendered,” that somehow, under the law, “men” have more “power” than “women” who are all hapless damsels in distress constantly in need of Sherif fGood Man to help her out. Except…apparently his ex-wife wasn’t asking him for help. Nor was Mr. Wall himself. The sheriff, then, as we see repeatedly in these cases, took it upon himself to push the envelope, inserting himself into this case, monitoring Mr. Wall’s speech on Facebook, and repeatedly trying to frame him as “mentally ill” as opposed to say “driven to bankruptcy by corrupt courts and pig-fat policing.
The Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC) and its anti-democratic, strangely and unequally gendered policing and judiciary, along with its kangaroo courts–family courts, domestic violence courts, drug courts parole and community custody, adjudicative law– are all in conflict with many of the protections enshrined in the US constitution, yet they do their “work” largely in darkness, because the court system is not affordable, or accessible to ordinary people. Imagine: paying taxes so that we have fair courts, and then, paying twice to access them!
The US isn’t a “free country” by any definition, anywhere.
And these courts, the “predatory policing” that they are responsible for,are the direct cause of events like the recent Publix shooting in Florida. ANd the sheriff blames the guy’s ex-wife for not participating in gang stalking.
Gang Stalk Harder© Ladies!!
The Florida sheriff be needin’ his revenues! Two tiered justice system indeed, reaching deeply into the pockets of the middle classes, with no end in sight, as the bankster-o-pus eats into the lives of families.
The DVIC apparatus is the offshoot of America’s slavery system, that many educated persons indict as a cause of many social ills, and its gender-biased laws and false narratives of domestic violence, and family are at the root of many of today’s mass shootings.
States are complicit in illicit activity that does indeed resemble “human trafficking*” as they all derive capital from a variety of sources that infringe upon individual rights. This–along with its medical mafia’s as we saw with the Sackler family creating the opioid crisis and a host of other social diseases like this boy, a victim of a child abuse ring--is organized crime at an international scale, working with the lending apparatus and stae accounting practices.
It is a war against men and families, a way to ruin lives, as we see in the millions of cases that have hit divorce and family courts throughout the last four decades, as the tentacles of state governments inter-twine with the tentacles of international banksters. If Mr. Wall was “crazy” you can bet these state practices were a huge part of his “mental illness.”
*human trafficking is a code word in the online gang stalking dialectic, one way that state operatives talk to each other online about how states do exactly what I describe above, and derive federal dollars from these practices of “driving people crazy.”
When the white, Protestant/Mormon FBI and their helpers in the “Hollywood mafia* “stalked actress Jean Seberg to death, they did it across continents, and they did it with precise inter-agency, CIA informed malice.
A brief look at the case of Martin Luther King Jr. provides ample examples of what a “gang” of “stalkers” looks like, as we see that US Army intelligence stalked him–and his father, and his father before him. Imagine that: US Army intelligence, stalking activists outside of the scope of the legal due process and warranted “investigation.”
But the New York Times merely said that Seberg ” suffered a crack-up,” as if she had “lost her mind” when in fact she was targeted with the FBI-CIA derived COINTELPRO, because she ws a progressive, and backed the Black Panther Party..
Here is the NYT piece, “memorializing” her “crack-up,” and here below at All That’s Interesting, we see the other side of the coin, as the FBI hounding her to death is widely cited as the exact reason she killed herself:
How Iconic Movie Star And Activist Jean Seberg Was Driven To Suicide By A Covert FBI Program
From ATI:
After ascending to the heights of Hollywood, Seberg used her influence to promote progressive social reforms. Her support of the Black Panther Party, however, would be her undoing. The FBI smeared her legacy. Hollywood chewed her up. She was viciously harassed by her own government.
While large swaths of people likely do not know Seberg’s full story or even her name, they will soon be introduced to her by way of the upcoming film starring Kristen Stewart as the ill-fated actress.
So journalist Christopher Sign killed himself, after he was stalked by “trolls” according to the Sun. And he left behind a wife and three children too. I can’t imagine “whodunnit,” but I can indeed imagine the politics behind it.
Here, look at the case of Martin Luther King, or Malcolm X who were stalked by US Army intelligence agents for THREE GENERATIONS, under the ever watchful eyes of the FBI, and their racist enablers and assistants in the Anti Defamation League. IN order to understand how black/brown/other men were gang stalked, with FBI agents and their racist affiliates in the Ku Klux Klan, or ADL sending these guys hate mail, and telling them to kill themselves, stalking them across the country, and actually plotting to destroy them in many ways, compare that to what might have been going on behind the scenes in Mr. Sign’s life, in the days/weeks/months/years before he killed himself. And he was no Malcolm X, we know that with certainty.
It probably wasn’t a case where Hillary Clinton was sitting behind her crystal ball and sending flying monkey’s after Sign, but likely other political operatives working completely independently after Sign published his book. And many of those operatives exactly what are described as “gangs” of “stalkers,” comprised of current and former police, firefighters, intelligence agents, NGOs, community policing elements, Infragard agents, and others in their webs of influence, such as we see here, and here, and here.
You can also glimpse the mind of a cyber stalker here, as Ramajana Hidic Demirovic is indicted by the feds. She was a progressive-holocaust studies political operative who stalked young boys, threatening to “destroy their lives.” Gang stalkers are indeed politically motivated but ATEOTD are all merely useful idiots for the 1% (you can guess who “they” are.)
And I too have endured the kind of blackmail, harassment, and vicious trolling that he likely endured too. I mean–why would a guy just up and kill himself, only to be found at the hour his kids start school? What kind of pressure was he under? If you guessed ” the same kind as the rest of “us”,” you would be correct. He was likely stalked, blackmailed, harassed, and targeted by these psychopaths; and he was cornered into a Catch 22 situation, because otherwise, his life was pure roses–no indications that he had trouble until AFTER he began recieving death threats, and was forced to create code words so that his children knew what is real, and what isn’t–to identify the messengers of doom from the messengers of truth.
Because gang stalking is exactly that weird. WHile I do not often venture into “conspiracy theroy,” I will right here and now:
-he was being blackmailed due to porn/gay sex/or girlfriends
-he was being blackmailed via the internet and in real life
-he was being leveraged with information that could cast him in an ill light, or cause his wife to seek a divorce.
Because otherwise, his life–an Emmy Award winning journalist–was truly one that anyone would be proud of.
As they say, right? Only the “good” die young. And, it validates the oft-repeated phrase “the gang stalkers will try to get you to kill yourself,” and provides insight into the term of art expressed by these psychopaths in the gang stalking dialectic online “forced suicide.”
Because failing that? “They” will assassinate you.
Related Story: Former state legislator and college professor from MI, Ashley Henley brutally murdered, while trimming her lawn this week after police interactions that focused on taking away her guns. Who is murdering Republican’s in the USA?
*I encountered the “Hollywood Mafia” many times, in many ways over the last several decades, and they are a “real thing.” Search my posts about the IMDB gang of stalkers or “IMDB Gang” and note the Ramajana Demirovic case being prosecuted by the feds as I write this. Most notoriously, I encountered these CIA affiliated “stalkers” and their actual victims through a friend who was integral in opening the case of the “Wonderland Murders,” which involved a porn star. No small surprise that the IMDB has that listed, lol.